Department of Internal Medicine, Stadtspital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Heart Initiative, Durham, NC.
Am Heart J. 2024 Aug;274:119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.019. Epub 2024 May 12.
The STRONG-HF trial showed that high-intensity care (HIC) consisting of rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and close follow-up reduced all-cause death or heart failure (HF) readmission at 180 days compared to usual care (UC). We hypothesized that significant differences in patient characteristics, management, and outcomes over the enrolment period may exist.
Two groups of the 1,078 patients enrolled in STRONG-HF were created according to the order of enrolment within center. The early group consisted of the first 10 patients enrolled at each center (N = 342) and the late group consisted of the following patients (N = 736).
Late enrollees were younger, had more frequently reduced ejection fraction, slightly lower NT-proBNP and creatinine levels compared with early enrollees. The primary outcome occurred less frequently in early compared to late enrollees (15% vs. 21%, aHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.42-0.99, P = .044). No treatment-by-enrolment interaction was seen in respect to the average percentage of optimal dose of GDMT after randomization, which was consistently higher in early and late patients randomized to HIC compared to UC. The higher use of renin-angiotensin-inhibitors in the HIC arm was more pronounced in the late enrollees both after randomization (interaction-P = .013) and at 90 days (interaction-P < .001). No interaction was observed for safety events. Patients randomized late to UC displayed a trend toward more severe outcomes (26% vs. 16%, P = .10), but the efficacy of HIC showed no interaction with the enrolment group (aHR 0.77, 95% CI 0.35-1.67 in early and 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.83 in late enrollees, adjusted interaction-P = .51) with similar outcomes in the HIC arm in late and early enrollees (16% vs. 13%, P = .73).
Late enrollees have different clinical characteristics and higher event rates compared to early enrollees. GDMT implementation in the HIC arm robustly achieved similar doses with consistent efficacy in early and late enrollees, mitigating the higher risk of adverse outcome in late enrollees.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03412201.
STRONG-HF 试验表明,与常规护理(UC)相比,由指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)快速滴定和密切随访组成的高强度护理(HIC)可降低 180 天内全因死亡或心力衰竭(HF)再入院率。我们假设在招募期间可能存在患者特征、管理和结局的显著差异。
根据在中心内的招募顺序,将 STRONG-HF 中纳入的 1078 名患者分为两组。早期组由每个中心招募的前 10 名患者组成(N=342),晚期组由其余患者组成(N=736)。
晚期入组者较早期入组者年轻,射血分数降低更频繁,NT-proBNP 和肌酐水平略低。与晚期入组者相比,早期入组者主要结局的发生率较低(15% vs. 21%,aHR 0.65,95%CI 0.42-0.99,P=0.044)。在随机分组后平均 GDMT 最佳剂量的百分比方面,未观察到治疗与入组的交互作用,与 UC 相比,随机分配至 HIC 的早期和晚期患者的 GDMT 剂量均更高。在晚期入组者中,HIC 组中肾素-血管紧张素抑制剂的使用增加更为明显,无论是在随机分组后(交互作用-P=0.013)还是在 90 天时(交互作用-P<0.001)。安全性事件无交互作用。随机分配至 UC 的晚期患者的结局更严重,但呈趋势(26% vs. 16%,P=0.10),但 HIC 的疗效与入组组无交互作用(早期入组者 aHR 为 0.77,95%CI 为 0.35-1.67,晚期入组者 aHR 为 0.58,95%CI 为 0.40-0.83,调整后的交互作用-P=0.51),HIC 组在晚期和早期入组者中的结局相似(16% vs. 13%,P=0.73)。
与早期入组者相比,晚期入组者具有不同的临床特征和更高的事件发生率。在 HIC 组中实施 GDMT 可实现类似的剂量,且早期和晚期入组者的疗效一致,减轻了晚期入组者不良结局的较高风险。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03412201。