Suppr超能文献

我们需要一个神经外科虚弱指数吗?

Do we need a neurosurgical frailty index?

作者信息

Adebola Oluwaseyi

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Apr 19;15:134. doi: 10.25259/SNI_50_2024. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of elderly patients now require neurosurgical intervention, and it is sometimes unclear if the benefits of surgery outweigh the risks, especially considering the confounding factor of numerous comorbidities and often poor functional states. Historically, many patients were denied surgery on the basis of age alone. This paper examines the current selection criteria being used to determine which patients get offered neurosurgical management and attempts to show if these patients have a good outcome. Particular focus is given to the increasing insight into the need to develop a neurosurgical frailty index.

METHODS

Using a prospective cohort study, this study observed 324 consecutive patients () over a 3-month period who were ≥65 years of age at the time of referral or admission to the neurosurgical department of the Royal Hallamshire Hospital. It highlights the selection model used to determine if surgical intervention was in the patient's best interest and explores the reasons why some patients did not need to have surgery or were considered unsuitable for surgery. Strengths and weaknesses of different frailty indices and indicators of functional status currently in use are discussed, and how they differ between the patients who had surgery and those who did not.

RESULTS

Sixty-one (18.83%) of were operated on in the timeframe studied. Compared to patients not operated, they were younger, less frail, and more functionally independent. The 30-day mortality of patients who had surgery was 3.28%, and despite the stringent definition of poor outcomes, 65.57% of patients had good postoperative results overall, suggesting that the present selection model for surgery produces good outcomes. The independent variables that showed the greatest correlation with outcome were emergency surgery, the American Society of Anesthesiology grade, the Glasgow Coma Scale, and modified frailty index-5.

CONCLUSION

It would be ideal to carry out future studies of similar designs with a much larger sample size with the goal of improving existing selection criteria and possibly developing a neurosurgical frailty index.

摘要

背景

现在越来越多的老年患者需要神经外科干预,有时尚不清楚手术的益处是否超过风险,尤其是考虑到众多合并症和通常较差的功能状态这一混杂因素。从历史上看,许多患者仅因年龄就被拒绝手术。本文研究了目前用于确定哪些患者接受神经外科治疗的选择标准,并试图表明这些患者是否有良好的预后。特别关注对制定神经外科衰弱指数必要性的日益深入的认识。

方法

本研究采用前瞻性队列研究,在3个月期间观察了324例连续患者(),这些患者在转诊或入住皇家哈勒姆郡医院神经外科时年龄≥65岁。它突出了用于确定手术干预是否符合患者最佳利益的选择模型,并探讨了一些患者不需要手术或被认为不适合手术的原因。讨论了目前使用的不同衰弱指数和功能状态指标的优缺点,以及它们在接受手术和未接受手术的患者之间的差异。

结果

在所研究的时间范围内,61例(18.83%)患者接受了手术。与未接受手术的患者相比,他们更年轻、衰弱程度更低且功能更独立。接受手术的患者30天死亡率为3.28%,尽管对不良结局的定义很严格,但总体上65.57%的患者术后结果良好,这表明目前的手术选择模型能产生良好的预后。与结局相关性最大的独立变量是急诊手术、美国麻醉医师协会分级、格拉斯哥昏迷量表和改良衰弱指数-5。

结论

未来进行类似设计、样本量更大的研究,以改进现有选择标准并可能制定神经外科衰弱指数,将是理想的做法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7561/11090588/a7a3abd25a74/SNI-15-134-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验