Laboratory for Early Markers of Neurodegeneration, Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition, and Mobility, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Occupational Therapy Department, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Aug;31(8):e16327. doi: 10.1111/ene.16327. Epub 2024 May 14.
Subtle executive dysfunction is common in people newly diagnosed with Parkinson disease (PD), even when general cognitive abilities are intact. This study examined the Short Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA-10)'s known-group construct validity, comparing persons with PD to healthy controls (HCs) and nonmanifesting carriers of LRRK2 and GBA gene mutations to HCs. Additionally, convergent and ecological validity was examined.
The study included 73 participants: 22 with idiopathic PD (iPD) who do not carry any of the founder GBA mutations or LRRK2-G2019S, 29 nonmanifesting carriers of the G2019S-LRRK2 (n = 14) and GBA (n = 15) mutations, and 22 HCs. Known-group validity was determined using the WCPA-10, convergent validity by also using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Color Trails Test (CTT), and ecological validity by using the WCPA-10, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale (SE ADL), and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).
Known-group validity of the WCPA-10 was established for the iPD group only; they followed fewer rules (p = 0.020), were slower (p = 0.003) and less efficient (p = 0.001), used more strategies (p = 0.017) on the WCPA-10, and achieved significantly lower CTT scores (p < 0.001) than the HCs. The nonmanifesting carriers and HCs were similar on all cognitive tests. Convergent and ecological validity of the WCPA-10 were partially established, with few correlations between WCPA-10 outcome measures and the MoCA (r = 0.50, r = 0.41), CTT-2 (r = 0.43), SE ADL (r = 0.41), and PASE (r = 0.54, r = 0.46, r = 0.31).
This study affirms the known-group validity for most (four) WCPA-10 scores and partially confirms its convergent and ecological validity for PD.
即使认知能力完整,新诊断为帕金森病(PD)的患者也常存在轻微执行功能障碍。本研究通过比较 PD 患者与健康对照者(HCs),LRRK2 和 GBA 基因突变非表现型携带者与 HCs,评估短周期日历计划活动(WCPA-10)的已知群组构念效度。同时,还评估了该量表的聚合效度和生态效度。
本研究纳入 73 名参与者:22 名特发性 PD(iPD)患者,不携带任何 GBA 突变或 LRRK2-G2019S 突变;29 名非表现型 LRRK2-G2019S(n=14)和 GBA(n=15)突变携带者;22 名 HCs。通过 WCPA-10 评估已知群组效度,通过蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和色连线测试(CTT)评估聚合效度,通过 WCPA-10、Schwab 和 England 日常生活活动量表(SE ADL)和老年人体力活动量表(PASE)评估生态效度。
仅在 iPD 组中确立了 WCPA-10 的已知群组效度;他们遵循的规则更少(p=0.020),速度更慢(p=0.003)且效率更低(p=0.001),在 WCPA-10 上使用的策略更多(p=0.017),且 CTT 评分明显更低(p<0.001)。非表现型携带者与 HCs 在所有认知测试上均相似。WCPA-10 的聚合效度和生态效度部分得到确立,WCPA-10 结果与 MoCA(r=0.50,r=0.41)、CTT-2(r=0.43)、SE ADL(r=0.41)和 PASE(r=0.54,r=0.46,r=0.31)之间的相关性较低。
本研究肯定了 WCPA-10 的大多数(四项)评分的已知群组效度,部分证实了其在 PD 中的聚合效度和生态效度。