• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府和渔民如何合作参与生态恢复的禁渔期?

How can governments and fishermen collaborate to participate in a fishing ban for ecological restoration?

机构信息

School of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China; Institute of Rural Revitalization, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; Yangtze Delta Region Academy (Jiaxing), Beijing Institute of Technology, Jiaxing 314001, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:120958. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120958. Epub 2024 May 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120958
PMID:38744206
Abstract

To safeguard aquatic ecosystems and fishery resources while facilitating cooperative engagement between local governments and fishermen, an evolutionary game model featuring both stakeholders has been constructed in this study. The model examines the degree of compliance with ecological restoration policies linked to fishing bans, as well as the adaptive strategies of different types of fishermen with varied incentives while simulating the ecological restoration policy under diverse scenarios. The findings suggest that: (1) Compliance with the fishing ban policy among fishermen is determined by their economic interests, environmental preferences, and government regulations, while its enforcement by local authorities is influenced by regulatory costs, political performance, and reputation. (2) Variations in the ecological restoration policy of fishing bans result from several factors, including punitive measures and compensation. The higher the penalty, the greater the chance of compliance among fishermen, and the higher the restoration degree of the watershed ecosystem. Conversely, the higher the compensation, the more satisfied the fishermen are with the fishing ban policy, and the smoother the transformation of their livelihoods. (3) To enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of fishing bans, it is essential to consider the interests of multiple stakeholders and adopt a coordination mechanism that facilitates the design of a reasonable and effective incentive-compatible system, thereby increasing the fairness and acceptability of the policy. This study provides a new theoretical framework and methodology applicable to ecological restoration policies for fishery closures on a global scale, accompanied by robust data support and theoretical guidance for developing and implementing fishery closure policies.

摘要

为了保护水生态系统和渔业资源,同时促进地方政府和渔民之间的合作,本研究构建了一个包含两个利益相关者的演化博弈模型。该模型考察了渔民遵守与禁渔相关的生态恢复政策的程度,以及不同激励机制下不同类型渔民的适应策略,同时模拟了不同情景下的生态恢复政策。研究结果表明:(1)渔民遵守禁渔政策的程度取决于他们的经济利益、环境偏好和政府规定,而地方当局的执行情况则受到监管成本、政治绩效和声誉的影响。(2)禁渔生态恢复政策的变化是由多种因素引起的,包括惩罚措施和补偿。惩罚力度越大,渔民遵守政策的可能性就越大,流域生态系统的恢复程度就越高。相反,补偿越高,渔民对禁渔政策的满意度就越高,生计转型就越顺利。(3)为了提高禁渔政策的有效性和可持续性,必须考虑多个利益相关者的利益,并采用协调机制,设计合理有效的激励相容制度,从而提高政策的公平性和可接受性。本研究为全球范围内的渔业禁捕生态恢复政策提供了新的理论框架和方法,为制定和实施渔业禁捕政策提供了强有力的数据支持和理论指导。

相似文献

1
How can governments and fishermen collaborate to participate in a fishing ban for ecological restoration?政府和渔民如何合作参与生态恢复的禁渔期?
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:120958. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120958. Epub 2024 May 13.
2
Compensation mechanisms for fishermen quit fishing: A case of Jiangsu province, China.渔民退捕补偿机制:以中国江苏省为例。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 26;9(7):e17648. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17648. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Research on the Impact of Livelihood Capital by the Honghu Fishermen's Willingness to Quit Fishing.洪湖渔民退捕意愿的生计资本影响研究
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;2022:1900301. doi: 10.1155/2022/1900301. eCollection 2022.
4
Cooperation between scientists, NGOs and industry in support of sustainable fisheries: the South African hake Merluccius spp. trawl fishery experience.科学家、非政府组织和行业之间的合作支持可持续渔业:南非无须鳕 Merluccius spp.拖网渔业的经验。
J Fish Biol. 2013 Oct;83(4):1019-34. doi: 10.1111/jfb.12118. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
5
Temporal and spatial predictions of effect of alternative fishing policies for the Gran Canaria marine ecosystem.大加那利岛海洋生态系统替代捕捞政策效果的时空预测。
J Fish Biol. 2019 Jun;94(6):882-895. doi: 10.1111/jfb.14012.
6
The Paraty artisanal fishery (southeastern Brazilian coast): ethnoecology and management of a social-ecological system (SES).巴西东南沿海的帕拉蒂手工艺渔业:社会-生态系统(SES)的民族生态学和管理。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012 Jun 27;8:22. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-8-22.
7
Short-term responses of macroinvertebrate assemblages to the "ten-year fishing ban" in the largest highland lake of the Yangtze basin.长江流域最大高原湖泊“十年禁渔”的短期响应:大型底栖无脊椎动物群落的变化。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 1;343:118160. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118160. Epub 2023 May 23.
8
Socio-economic features of commercial fishery in the bordering upper Danube River area of Serbia.塞尔维亚多瑙河上游毗邻地区商业渔业的社会经济特征。
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 May;184(5):2633-46. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2140-5. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
9
The right incentives enable ocean sustainability successes and provide hope for the future.正确的激励措施能促成海洋可持续发展的成功,并为未来带来希望。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 20;113(51):14507-14514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604982113. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
Ornamental fishing in the region of Barcelos, Amazonas: socioeconomic description and scenario of activity in the view of "piabeiros".亚马孙州巴塞罗斯地区的观赏性捕鱼:从“皮阿贝罗人”视角看社会经济描述及活动情况
Braz J Biol. 2020 Sep;80(3):544-556. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.215806. Epub 2019 Oct 7.