Suppr超能文献

简单的移动性测试可预测老年人对辅助设备的使用。

Simple Mobility Tests Predict Use of Assistive Devices in Older Adults.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Administration Department, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2024;47(4):175-182. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000413. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assistive devices (ADs) for ambulation are commonly provided to improve safety and independence in older adults. Despite the common use of these devices, there are no standard prescribing guidelines, and non-health care providers, including caregivers and family members, often make decisions about the need for ADs. Identifying factors or a single screening test associated with AD use would benefit clinicians and non-health care caregivers in making decisions to adopt an AD for patients, clients, and family members.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to identify the test that best predicts ADs for ambulation and non-AD use among community-dwelling individuals.

METHODS

Eighty-five older adults (81.6 ± 8.2 years old) who underwent outpatient physical therapy participated in this study. They participated in a series of tests, including the Timed Up and Go, handgrip and quadriceps strength, the 30-second chair-rise test, the 5-m fast gait speed, the Functional Independence Measure, the locomotive syndrome tests (stand-up test, 2-step test [2ST], and the Locomo-5 Checklist), and numeric pain scales. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to identify differences between those who did and did not use an AD for ambulation. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine which test best predicted AD use.

RESULTS

80% of participants (n = 68) used an AD for ambulation. There were significant differences in all test variables between users and nonusers ( P = .033 to P < .001), except for quadriceps strength, age, and pain (all P > .05). Only the 2ST was a significant predictor of AD use, with a cutoff distance of the toe-to-toe stride shorter than 93% of body height (sensitivity: 72%, and specificity: 82%, P = .048).

DISCUSSION

Simple functional measures differed between those who did and did not use ADs for ambulation; however, only the 2ST predicted AD status. Individuals who cannot step 93% of their body height may be appropriate for an AD.

CONCLUSIONS

If comprehensive clinical evaluations are not available to make decisions about AD use, the 2ST can be used to make clinical recommendations for an AD for ambulation.

摘要

背景

助行器常用于改善老年人的安全性和独立性。尽管这些设备被广泛使用,但没有标准的处方指南,非医疗保健提供者(包括护理人员和家庭成员)经常决定是否需要助行器。确定与助行器使用相关的因素或单一筛选测试将使临床医生和非医疗保健护理人员受益,有助于他们为患者、客户和家庭成员决定是否采用助行器。

目的/目标:本横断面研究的目的是确定最佳测试,以预测社区居住个体的助行器和非助行器的使用。

方法

85 名接受门诊物理治疗的老年人(81.6 ± 8.2 岁)参与了这项研究。他们参加了一系列测试,包括计时起立行走测试、握力和股四头肌力量测试、30 秒椅子起身测试、5 米快速步行速度测试、功能独立性测量、运动综合征测试(站立测试、2 步测试[2ST]和 Locomo-5 清单)和数字疼痛量表。曼-惠特尼 U 检验用于确定是否使用助行器进行步行的参与者之间的差异。逻辑回归分析用于检查哪种测试最能预测助行器的使用。

结果

80%的参与者(n=68)使用助行器进行步行。使用者和非使用者在所有测试变量上均有显著差异(P=0.033 至 P<0.001),除了股四头肌力量、年龄和疼痛(均 P>0.05)。只有 2ST 是助行器使用的显著预测因素,足尖对足尖步幅短于身高的 93%(敏感性:72%,特异性:82%,P=0.048)。

讨论

使用和不使用助行器进行步行的个体之间的简单功能测量有所不同;然而,只有 2ST 预测了 AD 状态。无法迈出身高 93%的步幅的个体可能适合使用助行器。

结论

如果无法进行全面的临床评估来决定是否使用助行器,可以使用 2ST 来为助行器的步行提供临床建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验