Department of Orthodontics, Clinic of Dentistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Georg-Voigt-Str. 3, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Departement of Pneumology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 14;24(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04351-1.
The etiology of sleep bruxism in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients is not yet fully clarified. This prospective clinical study aimed to investigate the connection between probable sleep bruxism, electromyographic muscle tone, and respiratory sleep patterns recorded during polysomnography.
106 patients with OSA (74 males, 31 females, mean age: 56.1 ± 11.4 years) were divided into two groups (sleep bruxism: SB; no sleep bruxism: NSB). Probable SB were based on the AASM criteria: self-report of clenching/grinding, orofacial symptoms upon awakening, abnormal tooth wear and hypertrophy of the masseter muscle. Both groups underwent clinical examination for painful muscle symptoms aligned with Temporomandibular Disorders Diagnostic Criteria (DC/TMD), such as myalgia, myofascial pain, and headache attributed to temporomandibular disorder. Additionally, non-complaint positive muscle palpation and orofacial-related limitations (Jaw Functional Limited Scale-20: JFLS-20) were assessed. A one-night polysomnography with electromyographic masseter muscle tone (EMG) measurement was performed. Descriptive data, inter-group comparisons and multivariate logistic regression were calculated.
OSA patients had a 37.1% prevalence of SB. EMG muscle tone (N1-N3, REM; P = 0.001) and the number of hypopneas (P = 0.042) were significantly higher in the sleep bruxism group. While measures like apnea-hypopnea-index (AHI), respiratory-disturbance-index (RDI), apnea index (AI), hypopnea-index (HI), number of arousals, and heart rate (1/min) were elevated in sleep bruxers, the differences were not statistically significant. There was no difference in sleep efficiency (SE; P = 0.403). Non-complaint masseter muscle palpation (61.5%; P = 0.015) and myalgia (41%; P = 0.010) were significant higher in SB patients. Multivariate logistic regression showed a significant contribution of EMG muscle tone and JFLS-20 to bruxism risk.
Increased EMG muscle tone and orofacial limitations can predict sleep bruxism in OSA patients. Besides, SB patients suffer more from sleep disorder breathing. Thus, sleep bruxism seems to be not only an oral health related problem in obstructive apnea. Consequently, interdisciplinary interventions are crucial for effectively treating these patients.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Philipps-University Marburg (reg. no. 13/22-2022) and registered at the "German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS" (DRKS0002959).
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者磨牙症的病因尚未完全阐明。本前瞻性临床研究旨在调查多导睡眠图记录的可能磨牙症、肌电图肌肉紧张度和呼吸睡眠模式之间的联系。
106 例 OSA 患者(74 例男性,31 例女性,平均年龄:56.1±11.4 岁)分为两组(磨牙症:SB;无磨牙症:NSB)。可能的磨牙症基于 AASM 标准:自我报告的紧咬牙/磨牙、觉醒时的口面部症状、异常牙齿磨损和咬肌肥大。两组均接受颞下颌关节紊乱诊断标准(DC/TMD)相关的疼痛肌肉症状的临床检查,如肌痛、肌筋膜疼痛和颞下颌关节紊乱引起的头痛。此外,还评估了非抱怨性阳性肌肉触诊和口面部相关限制(Jaw Functional Limited Scale-20:JFLS-20)。进行了一夜的多导睡眠图和咬肌肌电图(EMG)测量。计算描述性数据、组间比较和多元逻辑回归。
OSA 患者磨牙症的患病率为 37.1%。磨牙症组的 EMG 肌肉紧张度(N1-N3,REM;P=0.001)和呼吸暂停低通气次数(P=0.042)明显更高。尽管睡眠呼吸暂停指数(AHI)、呼吸紊乱指数(RDI)、呼吸暂停指数(AI)、呼吸暂停低通气指数(HI)、觉醒次数和心率(1/min)等指标在磨牙症患者中升高,但差异无统计学意义。睡眠效率(SE;P=0.403)无差异。SB 患者的非抱怨性咬肌触诊(61.5%;P=0.015)和肌痛(41%;P=0.010)明显更高。多元逻辑回归显示,EMG 肌肉紧张度和 JFLS-20 对磨牙症风险有显著贡献。
增加的 EMG 肌肉紧张度和口面部限制可以预测 OSA 患者的磨牙症。此外,磨牙症患者的睡眠障碍呼吸更为严重。因此,磨牙症似乎不仅是阻塞性呼吸暂停的口腔健康相关问题。因此,需要进行跨学科干预才能有效地治疗这些患者。
该研究得到了马尔堡菲利普大学伦理委员会的批准(注册号:13/22-2022),并在“德国临床试验注册中心,DRKS”(DRKS0002959)注册。