Newman John Paul, Lendák-Kabók Karolina
History, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Eur Rev Hist. 2024 Apr 15;31(2):310-329. doi: 10.1080/13507486.2024.2315600. eCollection 2024.
This article provides an analytical overview of welfare policymaking and provision in the twentieth century in Yugoslavia at three decisive historical junctures. Those are: the Kingdom of Yugoslavia after the First World War; the socialist state after 1945; and the rump 'Yugoslavia' after the break-up of the state in 1991. In each of these periods welfare policies were crisis-driven, a response to massive social and economic upheaval caused by war, but they were also a reflection, of course, of the political ideals and the values of the state in which they were formed. The authors argue that the Yugoslav welfare state in its various incarnations was in part a response to socio-economic crisis caused by war, in part a mediation and an adaptation of the welfare regime it replaced (rather than a complete tabula rasa), and in part an articulation of the aspirations for national politics and citizenship held by the incoming leadership of the state. This comparative study of three important moments in Yugoslavia's welfare history, then, offers an opportunity to look anew at the social history of the state itself. Study of the Yugoslav welfare model, or rather models, helps us understand the larger political transformations that were bound up in the lifespan of the South Slav state, how the state thought about and created minorities through welfare regimes, and how welfare policies withstood (or not) socio-economic crisis.
本文对20世纪南斯拉夫在三个决定性历史关头的福利政策制定与实施情况进行了分析概述。这三个关头分别是:第一次世界大战后的南斯拉夫王国;1945年后的社会主义国家;以及1991年国家解体后的残余“南斯拉夫”。在每个时期,福利政策都是由危机驱动的,是对战争引发的大规模社会和经济动荡的回应,但它们当然也是其形成所在国家的政治理想和价值观的反映。作者认为,南斯拉夫不同时期的福利国家,部分是对战争引发的社会经济危机的回应,部分是对其所取代的福利制度的调解与适应(而非完全摒弃),部分是国家新领导层对国家政治和公民身份诉求的表达。因此,对南斯拉夫福利历史上三个重要时刻的比较研究,为重新审视该国本身的社会历史提供了契机。对南斯拉夫福利模式,或者更确切地说是多种模式的研究,有助于我们理解与这个南斯拉夫国家存续期紧密相连的更大规模的政治变革,国家如何通过福利制度来界定和塑造少数群体,以及福利政策如何经受(或未能经受住)社会经济危机的考验。