Suppr超能文献

为什么不同的脊髓损伤患者自主神经反射异常的症状严重程度不同?探索脊髓损伤后血管α-1肾上腺素能受体与压力反射敏感性之间的关系。

Why do different people with Spinal Cord Injury have differing severity of symptoms with Autonomic Dysreflexia? Exploring relationships of vascular alpha-1 adrenoreceptor and baroreflex sensitivity after SCI.

作者信息

Higano Jennifer Dens, Burns Kathryn, Smith Geoffrey, Solinsky Ryan

机构信息

Mayo Clinic.

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 May 3:2024.05.02.24306772. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.02.24306772.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) commonly have autonomic dysreflexia (AD) with increased sympathetic activity. After SCI, individuals have decreased baroreflex sensitivity and increased vascular responsiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To evalate relationship between baroreflex and blood vessel sensitivity with autonomic dysreflexia symptoms.

DESIGN

Case control.

SETTING

Tertiary academic center.

PATIENTS

14 individuals with SCI, 17 matched uninjured controls.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants quantified AD symptoms using the Autonomic Dysfunction Following SCI (ADFSCI)-AD survey. Participants received three intravenous phenylephrine boluses, reproducibly increasing systolic blood pressure (SBP) 15-40 mmHg. Continuous heart rate (R-R interval, ECG), beat-to-beat blood pressures (finapres), and popliteal artery flow velocity were recorded. Vascular responsiveness (α1 adrenoreceptor sensitivity) and heart rate responsiveness to increased SBP (baroreflex sensitivity) were calculated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Baroreflex sensitivity after increased SBP; Vascular responsiveness through quantified mean arterial pressure (MAP) 2-minute area under the curve and change in vascular resistance.

RESULTS

SCI and control cohorts were well-matched with mean age 31.9 and 29.6 years (p=0.41), 21.4% and 17.6% female respectively. Baseline MAP (p=0.83) and R-R interval (p=0.39) were similar. ADFSCI-AD scores were higher following SCI (27.9+/-22.9 vs 4.2+/-2.9 in controls, p=0.002).To quantify SBP response, MAP area under the curve was normalized to dose/bodyweight. Individuals with SCI had significantly larger responses (0.26+/-0.19 mmHgs/kgug) than controls (0.06+/-0.06 mmHgs/kgug, p=0.002). Similarly, leg vascular resistance increased after SCI (24% vs 6% to a normalized dose, p=0.007). Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly lower after SCI (15.0+/-8.3 vs 23.7+/-9.3 ms/mmHg, p=0.01). ADFSCI-AD subscore had no meaningful correlation with vascular responsiveness (R=0.008) or baroreflex sensitivity (R=0.092) after SCI.

CONCLUSIONS

While this confirms smaller previous studies suggesting increased α1 adrenoreceptor sensitivity and lower baroreflex sensitivity in individuals with SCI, these differences lacked correlation to increased symptoms of AD. Further research into physiologic mechanisms to explain why some individuals with SCI develop symptoms is needed.

摘要

引言

脊髓损伤(SCI)患者通常会出现自主神经反射异常(AD),交感神经活动增强。脊髓损伤后,患者的压力反射敏感性降低,血管反应性增强。

目的

评估压力反射和血管敏感性与自主神经反射异常症状之间的关系。

设计

病例对照研究。

地点

三级学术中心。

患者

14例脊髓损伤患者,17例匹配的未受伤对照者。

干预措施

所有参与者使用脊髓损伤后自主神经功能障碍(ADFSCI)-AD调查问卷对AD症状进行量化。参与者接受三次静脉注射去氧肾上腺素推注,可重复性地使收缩压(SBP)升高15 - 40 mmHg。记录连续心率(R-R间期,心电图)、逐搏血压(Finapres)和腘动脉血流速度。计算血管反应性(α1肾上腺素能受体敏感性)和心率对升高的SBP的反应性(压力反射敏感性)。

主要观察指标

SBP升高后的压力反射敏感性;通过量化平均动脉压(MAP)曲线下2分钟面积和血管阻力变化来评估血管反应性。

结果

脊髓损伤组和对照组在平均年龄上匹配良好,分别为31.9岁和29.6岁(p = 0.41),女性分别占21.4%和17.6%。基线MAP(p = 0.83)和R-R间期(p = 0.39)相似。脊髓损伤后ADFSCI-AD评分更高(脊髓损伤组为27.9±22.9,对照组为4.2±2.9,p = 0.002)。为了量化SBP反应,将MAP曲线下面积按剂量/体重进行标准化。脊髓损伤患者的反应明显大于对照组(0.26±0.19 mmHgs/kgμg)(对照组为0.06±0.06 mmHgs/kgμg,p = 0.002)。同样,脊髓损伤后腿部血管阻力增加(标准化剂量下分别为24%和6%,p = 0.007)。脊髓损伤后压力反射敏感性显著降低(15.0±8.3 vs 23.7±9.3 ms/mmHg,p = 0.01)。脊髓损伤后ADFSCI-AD子评分与血管反应性(R = 0.008)或压力反射敏感性(R = 0.092)无显著相关性。

结论

虽然这证实了先前较小规模研究表明脊髓损伤患者α1肾上腺素能受体敏感性增加和压力反射敏感性降低,但这些差异与AD症状增加无关。需要进一步研究生理机制以解释为何一些脊髓损伤患者会出现症状。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7878/11092739/24bdc67b8f3b/nihpp-2024.05.02.24306772v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验