Swiss Visio Montchoisi Clinic, Lausanne, Vaud.
Genève Ophtalmologie Clinic, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Glaucoma. 2024 Sep 1;33(9):640-644. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002421. Epub 2024 May 16.
In this retrospective study, nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) interventions showed similar >90% complete success rates at 1-year postsurgery. However, NPDS achieved a superior safety profile in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recovery and rates of post-surgical complications.
Comparing the surgical outcomes of 2 surgical techniques: NPDS and PDS.
This was a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study including 66 eyes from 57 patients aged 69 ± 9 years who underwent either NPDS or PDS for medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma. Outcome measurements included intraocular pressure (IOP), BCVA, rates of complications, postoperative corrective interventions, and glaucoma medications at baseline and at all postoperative appointments up to 1 year. An exploratory mixed-effect model was used to assess the intergroup differences between IOP and BCVA.
One-year postsurgery, a similar significant IOP reduction from baseline was observed in NPDS (from 19.9 ± 1.3 to 11.5 ± 0.9 mm Hg, P < 0.001) and PDS (from 19.5 ± 1.1 to 10.7 ± 0.6 mm Hg, P < 0.001). A conservative complete success rate (defined as medicated IOP ≤16 mm Hg and ≥20% reduction in IOP) was 87% for NPDS and 97% for PDS. No BCVA changes were observed between baseline and 1-year postsurgery in both groups, and glaucoma medications showed a similar 10-fold reduction in both groups ( P < 0.001 vs baseline). However, a significant difference in the speed of postoperative BVCA recovery was observed between NPDS and PDS ( P < 0.01), with NPDS showing a faster recovery. Moreover, lower numbers of postsurgical complications and postoperative interventions were observed after NPDS compared with PDS [NPDS, n = 30 and 34 vs PDS, n = 80 and 48 ( P < 0.05), respectively].
The present study confirmed that both NPDS and PDS are highly effective surgical interventions for the management of primary open angle glaucoma. However, NPDS had a superior safety profile in terms of BCVA recovery, complication rates, and postoperative interventions.
在这项回顾性研究中,非穿透性深层巩膜切除术(NPDS)和穿透性深层巩膜切除术(PDS)在术后 1 年的完全成功率均超过 90%。然而,NPDS 在最佳矫正视力(BCVA)恢复和术后并发症发生率方面具有更好的安全性。
比较两种手术技术的手术结果:NPDS 和 PDS。
这是一项回顾性、纵向、比较研究,纳入了 57 名年龄 69 ± 9 岁的患者的 66 只眼,这些患者因药物无法控制的开角型青光眼接受 NPDS 或 PDS 治疗。主要观察指标包括眼压(IOP)、BCVA、并发症发生率、术后矫正干预措施以及基线和术后 1 年所有预约的青光眼药物使用情况。采用探索性混合效应模型评估IOP 和 BCVA 的组间差异。
术后 1 年,NPDS(从 19.9 ± 1.3 降至 11.5 ± 0.9 mm Hg,P < 0.001)和 PDS(从 19.5 ± 1.1 降至 10.7 ± 0.6 mm Hg,P < 0.001)的眼压均有显著降低,且与基线相比差异有统计学意义。NPDS 的保守完全成功率(定义为药物治疗的眼压≤16 mmHg,眼压降低≥20%)为 87%,PDS 为 97%。两组患者的 BCVA 在基线和术后 1 年均无变化,且两组患者的青光眼药物均减少了 10 倍(与基线相比,P < 0.001)。然而,NPDS 和 PDS 之间观察到术后 BCVA 恢复速度的显著差异(P < 0.01),NPDS 恢复更快。此外,NPDS 组术后并发症和干预的数量明显少于 PDS 组[NPDS 组,n = 30 和 34 例;PDS 组,n = 80 和 48 例(P < 0.05)]。
本研究证实,NPDS 和 PDS 均为原发性开角型青光眼的有效手术治疗方法。然而,NPDS 在 BCVA 恢复、并发症发生率和术后干预方面具有更好的安全性。