Badersten A, Nilvéus R, Egelberg J
J Clin Periodontol. 1985 Jul;12(6):432-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1985.tb01379.x.
Incisors, cuspids and premolars in 49 patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were treated with initial, nonsurgical periodontal therapy. The results were monitored by probing attachment level measurements for 6 sites of each tooth every 3rd month during a period of 24 months. Amongst sites with initial probing depth greater than or equal to 4.0 mm, sites with probing attachment loss were identified using regression analysis. Scores for plaque, bleeding, suppuration on probing and probing depth, obtained for these sites during the 24-month study, were analyzed to determine whether any of the scores could be used diagnostically as an indicator of probing attachment loss. Diagnostic sensitivity and predictability were calculated for different levels of each of the scores. The results showed that sites with probing attachment loss were more frequent for sites with high scores for plaque, bleeding, residual probing depth and suppuration than in sites with low scores. However, the diagnostic sensitivity and predictability of these clinical indicators was generally low. Thus, records of plaque, bleeding, suppuration and probing depth do not obviate the need for probing attachment level measurements for identification of sites with probing attachment loss following initial, nonsurgical periodontal therapy.
对49例晚期慢性牙周炎患者的切牙、尖牙和前磨牙进行了初始非手术牙周治疗。在24个月期间,每3个月通过测量每颗牙齿6个位点的探诊附着水平来监测结果。在初始探诊深度大于或等于4.0 mm的位点中,使用回归分析确定有探诊附着丧失的位点。分析在24个月研究期间这些位点的菌斑、出血、探诊时化脓和探诊深度得分,以确定是否有任何得分可作为探诊附着丧失的诊断指标。计算每个得分不同水平的诊断敏感性和可预测性。结果表明,与低分位点相比,菌斑、出血、残余探诊深度和化脓得分高的位点有探诊附着丧失的情况更频繁。然而,这些临床指标的诊断敏感性和可预测性普遍较低。因此,菌斑、出血、化脓和探诊深度记录并不能消除在初始非手术牙周治疗后通过测量探诊附着水平来识别有探诊附着丧失位点的必要性。