Division of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
SBST Basel Office, Hematology Division, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024 May 3;154:3754. doi: 10.57187/s.3754.
Until the year 2000, allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was the standard treatment for young and fit chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. CML was the main indication for allogeneic HCT. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors changed the treatment of CML patients dramatically. Allogeneic HCT was rapidly replaced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for CML, and the indication shifted to the treatment of non-responders, patients intolerant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and patients whose CML is transforming to the accelerated phase and blast crisis. This paper describes changes in the use of transplantation technology for CML patients in the face of rapid drug development.
All patients receiving a transplant for CML between 1997 and 2021 in Switzerland were included in the study. For the purpose of this analysis, time periods were analysed in quinquennia, 1997-2001 (Q1), 2002-2006 (Q2), 2007-2011 (Q3), 2012-2016 (Q4) and 2017-2021 (Q5), as the observation period spanned 25 years.
Overall, 239 patients received a transplant. These included 96 in Q1, 56 in Q2, 25 in Q3, 34 in Q4 and 28 in Q5. Patient characteristics changed over time: recent patients were older and had a longer interval from diagnosis to transplantation because of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. However, the proportions of patients receiving transplants during an early versus advanced disease stage differed little. Transplant technology changed, as well. Patients received intensive conditioning regimens less often due to higher age and more commonly had peripheral blood as opposed to bone marrow transplants. However, the type of stem cell donor selected did not differ. In a univariable analysis, there were no significant differences in survival, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse incidence or incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease among the five quinquennia. In a multivariable analysis, older age, donors other than HLA-identical siblings and more advanced disease stage, but not the quinquennium, were associated with higher risk of death.
Since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors haematopoietic cell transplantation has been used less frequently to treat CML. Patients in recent cohorts received transplants at an older age and later in the disease course; despite these higher risks, the outcome of allogeneic HCT has not worsened over time but has not improved, either. As the outcome is worse in advanced phases, it is important to conduct transplants before disease progression. Therefore, patients with advanced disease should be monitored closely and receive transplants in time.
直到 2000 年,异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)仍是年轻且适合的慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者的标准治疗方法。CML 是异基因 HCT 的主要适应证。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的引入极大地改变了 CML 患者的治疗方法。异基因 HCT 迅速被酪氨酸激酶抑制剂取代,成为 CML 的一线治疗方法,适应证也转向治疗无反应者、不耐受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的患者以及 CML 向加速期和急变期转化的患者。本文描述了在快速药物开发的背景下,移植技术在 CML 患者中的应用变化。
本研究纳入了瑞士在 1997 年至 2021 年间接受移植治疗的所有 CML 患者。为了进行这项分析,研究人员将时间分为五个五年期,1997-2001 年(Q1)、2002-2006 年(Q2)、2007-2011 年(Q3)、2012-2016 年(Q4)和 2017-2021 年(Q5),因为观察期跨越了 25 年。
共有 239 名患者接受了移植。其中,Q1 组有 96 例,Q2 组有 56 例,Q3 组有 25 例,Q4 组有 34 例,Q5 组有 28 例。患者特征随时间发生了变化:由于酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的治疗,最近的患者年龄更大,从诊断到移植的时间间隔也更长。然而,接受早期和晚期疾病阶段移植的患者比例差异不大。由于年龄较大和更常见的外周血而非骨髓移植,接受强化调理方案的患者也较少。然而,选择的干细胞供体类型并没有差异。在单变量分析中,五个五年期之间在生存率、无进展生存率、非复发死亡率、复发率以及急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病的发生率方面没有显著差异。在多变量分析中,年龄较大、非 HLA 匹配的供体和更晚期的疾病阶段,而不是五年期,与更高的死亡风险相关。
自酪氨酸激酶抑制剂问世以来,造血细胞移植治疗 CML 的应用频率有所降低。最近的队列中患者接受移植的年龄更大,且处于疾病进程的晚期;尽管存在这些更高的风险,但异基因 HCT 的结果并未随时间恶化,也未得到改善。由于晚期阶段的预后较差,因此在疾病进展前进行移植很重要。因此,晚期疾病患者应密切监测并及时接受移植。