Velocity Clinical Research at Medical City, Dallas, Texas, USA
LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology, Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 May 14;12(3):e003930. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003930.
The objective of this review was to comprehensively present and summarize trends in reported rates of hypoglycemia with one or two times per day basal insulin analogs in individuals with type 2 diabetes to help address and contextualize the emerging theoretical concern of increased hypoglycemic risk with once-weekly basal insulins.Hypoglycemia data were extracted from treat-to-target randomized clinical trials conducted during 2000-2022. Published articles were identified on PubMed or within the US Food and Drug Administration submission documents. Overall, 57 articles were identified: 44 assessed hypoglycemic outcomes in participants receiving basal-only therapy (33 in insulin-naive participants; 11 in insulin-experienced participants), 4 in a mixed population (insulin-naive and insulin-experienced participants) and 9 in participants receiving basal-bolus therapy. For the analysis, emphasis was placed on level 2 (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL)) and level 3 (or severe) hypoglycemia.Overall, event rates for level 2 or level 3 hypoglycemia across most studies ranged from 0.06 to 7.10 events/person-year of exposure (PYE) for participants receiving a basal-only insulin regimen; the rate for basal-bolus regimens ranged from 2.4 to 13.6 events/PYE. Rates were generally lower with second-generation basal insulins (insulin degludec or insulin glargine U300) than with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin or first-generation basal insulins (insulin detemir or insulin glargine U100). Subgroup categorization by sulfonylurea usage, end-of-treatment insulin dose or glycated hemoglobin reduction did not show consistent trends on overall hypoglycemia rates. Hypoglycemia rates reported so far for once-weekly basal insulins are consistent with or lower than those reported for daily-administered basal insulin analogs.
本次综述的目的是全面呈现和总结 2 型糖尿病患者每天接受一次或两次基础胰岛素类似物治疗时报告的低血糖发生率趋势,以帮助解决并理解基础胰岛素每周注射一次时低血糖风险增加这一新兴理论问题。低血糖数据从 2000 年至 2022 年进行的靶向治疗随机临床试验中提取。在 PubMed 或美国食品和药物管理局提交文件中查找已发表的文章。共确定了 57 篇文章:44 篇评估了接受基础胰岛素治疗的参与者的低血糖结局(33 篇在胰岛素初治参与者中;11 篇在胰岛素经治参与者中),4 篇在混合人群(胰岛素初治和胰岛素经治参与者)中,9 篇在接受基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的参与者中。在分析中,重点放在 2 级(血糖 <3.0mmol/L(<54mg/dL))和 3 级(或严重)低血糖。在大多数研究中,接受基础胰岛素治疗的参与者的 2 级或 3 级低血糖发生率在 0.06 至 7.10 例/人年(PYE)之间;基础-餐时胰岛素治疗方案的发生率为 2.4 至 13.6 例/人年。第二代基础胰岛素(地特胰岛素或甘精胰岛素 U300)的发生率一般低于中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素或第一代基础胰岛素(德谷胰岛素或甘精胰岛素 U100)。根据磺脲类药物使用、治疗结束时的胰岛素剂量或糖化血红蛋白降低进行亚组分类,并未显示总体低血糖发生率的一致趋势。迄今为止报告的每周一次基础胰岛素的低血糖发生率与每日一次基础胰岛素类似物报告的发生率一致或更低。