Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜阑尾切除术后放置腹腔引流管在预防穿孔性阑尾炎术后腹腔脓肿中的作用。

The utility of intraperitoneal drain placement after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess prevention.

机构信息

Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Jabriya, Kuwait.

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 24923, 3110, Safat, Kuwait.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3571-3577. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10869-w. Epub 2024 May 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perforated appendicitis is associated with postoperative development of intraperitoneal abscess. Intraperitoneal drain placement during appendectomy is thought to reduce the risk of developing postoperative intraperitoneal abscess. The aim of this study was to determine whether intraperitoneal drainage could reduce the incidence of intraperitoneal abscess formation after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all patients (aged 7 and above) who were diagnosed with perforated appendicitis and subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between January 2018 and December 2022 at two government hospitals in the state of Kuwait. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative characteristics were compared between patients who underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal drain placement and those who did not. The primary outcome was the development of postoperative intraperitoneal abscess. Secondary outcomes included overall postoperative complications, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), length of stay (LOS), readmission and postoperative percutaneous drainage.

RESULTS

A total of 511 patients met the inclusion criteria between 2018 and 2022. Of these, 307 (60.1%) underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal drain placement. Patients with and without drains were similar regarding age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (Table 1). The overall rate of postoperative intraperitoneal abscess was 6.1%. Postoperatively, there was no difference in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess formation between patients who underwent intraperitoneal drain placement and those who did not (6.5% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.707). Patients with intraperitoneal drains had a longer LOS (4 [4, 6] vs. 3 [2, 5] days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the overall complication (18.6% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.065), superficial SSI (2.9% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.791) or readmission rate (4.9% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.835).

CONCLUSIONS

Following laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis, intraperitoneal drain placement appears to confer no additional benefit and may prolong hospital stay.

摘要

背景

穿孔性阑尾炎与术后腹腔脓肿的发生有关。阑尾切除术中放置腹腔引流管被认为可以降低术后发生腹腔脓肿的风险。本研究旨在确定在科威特两家政府医院进行的腹腔镜阑尾切除术中放置腹腔引流管是否可以降低穿孔性阑尾炎术后腹腔脓肿形成的发生率。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在科威特两家政府医院诊断为穿孔性阑尾炎并随后接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的所有(年龄 7 岁及以上)患者。比较了术中放置腹腔引流管和未放置引流管的患者的人口统计学、临床和围手术期特征。主要结局是术后发生腹腔脓肿。次要结局包括总体术后并发症、浅表手术部位感染(SSI)、住院时间(LOS)、再入院和术后经皮引流。

结果

2018 年至 2022 年期间,共有 511 例患者符合纳入标准。其中,307 例(60.1%)患者术中放置了腹腔引流管。有和没有引流管的患者在年龄、性别和 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)方面相似(表 1)。术后腹腔脓肿的总体发生率为 6.1%。术后,放置腹腔引流管和未放置引流管的患者腹腔脓肿形成率无差异(6.5%比 5.4%,p=0.707)。放置腹腔引流管的患者 LOS 较长(4 [4,6]比 3 [2,5]天,p<0.001)。总体并发症发生率(18.6%比 12.3%,p=0.065)、浅表 SSI(2.9%比 2.5%,p=0.791)或再入院率(4.9%比 4.4%,p=0.835)无差异。

结论

在腹腔镜阑尾切除术后放置腹腔引流管似乎没有额外的益处,反而可能会延长住院时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验