Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌临床试验设计的类型与进展:一项叙述性综述

Types and progress of clinical trial design for breast cancer: a narrative review.

作者信息

Zhou Teng, Zhang Jian

机构信息

Phase I Clinical Trial Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Jul 30;4:20. doi: 10.21037/tbcr-23-22. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In recent years, the field of breast cancer diagnosis and therapy has witnessed rapid technological advances. Concurrently, the emergence of molecular biology and novel detection methodologies has facilitated the transition of breast cancer management into the precision medicine era. The primary objective of this review is to discuss the transformation in the research and development paradigm for breast cancer therapies and strategies.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for relevant studies published over the past 20 years using keywords including "breast cancer", "clinical trial", "seamless", "master protocol", "umbrella", "basket", "platform", and "precision medicine". Articles were screened for eligibility and key data extracted. The search was limited to English-language publications.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

The review identifies three core innovations in breast cancer trial methodology: (I) in terms of research speed, the traditional three-stage drug development models are being substituted by "seamless designs" as exemplified by the immunotherapy combination study NCT0328056. (II) Addressing research breadth, "master protocols" such as basket trials (IMMU-132-01), umbrella trials (FUTURE), and platform trials (I-SPY 2) have been introduced, allowing the simultaneous assessment of multiple treatments or disease subtypes within a singular framework. (III) Pertaining to research precision, newer designs utilize biomarkers such as "enrichment" (seen in EMBRACA and OlympiA trials) and "marker stratification" (as in the SOLAR-1 trial), enabling the identification of appropriate patient subgroups and the provision of tailored therapy strategies, a stark contrast to traditional histopathology-based evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trial design in breast cancer research has been revolutionized, moving towards more efficient and targeted strategies. Despite the presence of ethical, logistical, and data complexities, it is anticipated that ongoing technological and regulatory enhancements will pave the way for even more refined research approaches, subsequently influencing future research, clinical practices, and policymaking in breast cancer care.

摘要

背景与目的

近年来,乳腺癌诊断与治疗领域见证了快速的技术进步。与此同时,分子生物学的出现和新型检测方法推动了乳腺癌管理向精准医学时代的转变。本综述的主要目的是探讨乳腺癌治疗的研发模式和策略的转变。

方法

我们系统检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,以查找过去20年发表的相关研究,关键词包括“乳腺癌”“临床试验”“无缝”“主方案”“伞形试验”“篮式试验”“平台试验”和“精准医学”。对文章进行筛选以确定其是否符合要求,并提取关键数据。检索仅限于英文出版物。

关键内容与发现

该综述确定了乳腺癌试验方法中的三项核心创新:(I)在研究速度方面,传统的三阶段药物开发模式正被“无缝设计”所取代,免疫治疗联合研究NCT0328056就是例证。(II)在研究广度方面,已引入“主方案”,如篮式试验(IMMU - 132 - 01)、伞形试验(FUTURE)和平台试验(I - SPY 2),允许在单一框架内同时评估多种治疗方法或疾病亚型。(III)在研究精准度方面,更新的设计利用生物标志物,如“富集”(见于EMBRACA和OlympiA试验)和“标志物分层”(如在SOLAR - 1试验中),能够识别合适的患者亚组并提供量身定制的治疗策略,这与传统的基于组织病理学的评估形成鲜明对比。

结论

乳腺癌研究中的临床试验设计已经发生了变革,朝着更高效、更具针对性的策略发展。尽管存在伦理、后勤和数据方面的复杂性,但预计持续的技术和监管改进将为更精细的研究方法铺平道路,进而影响未来乳腺癌护理的研究、临床实践和政策制定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/270f/11093090/8895bb9114db/tbcr-04-20-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验