Suppr超能文献

子宫动脉栓塞术与子宫肌瘤切除术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Fatima Kaneez, Ansari Haya Waseem, Ejaz Arooba, Khalid Furqanullah, Naz Aimen, Waqar Ayesha, Khan Adeela Sarfaraz, Godil Sana, Ayub Muhammad Zain, Tariq Muhammad Azaan, Salman Yumna, Shah Hassaan Ahmed

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

SAGE Open Med. 2024 May 14;12:20503121241236141. doi: 10.1177/20503121241236141. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Uterine fibroids are the commonest benign tumors of the reproductive tract in women of childbearing age. They are usually asymptomatic but can cause menorrhagia. Treatments include myomectomy and uterine artery embolization (UAE). The latter is a relatively new procedure, therefore of special interest.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies to provide a comprehensive outlook on the effectiveness of UAE by comparing its outcomes to those of myomectomy. Electronic databases (PubMed and Cochrane Central) were systematically searched from January 2000 to March 2022 for published randomized control trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses that compared UAE to myomectomy for at least one of the pre-specified outcomes, namely re-intervention rates, length of hospital stay, and complications.

METHODS

We shortlisted nine studies for the final analysis. For continuous outcomes, results from random-effects meta-analysis were presented as mean differences (MDs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The final analysis consisted of nine studies. Factors like re-intervention, hospitalization, and complications, each with its unique follow-up duration were assessed. Pooled analysis demonstrated significant results for greater re-intervention rates with UAE as compared to myomectomy (RR: 2.16, 95% CI: (1.27-3.66), value 0.004, heterogeneity  = 85%). UAE holds a greater but statistically insignificant risk for major complications (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: (0.29-1.33), value 0.22, heterogeneity  = 0%) and myomectomy shows a statistically insignificant greater risk for minor complications (RR: 1.72, 95% CI: (0.92-3.22), value 0.09, heterogeneity  = 0%). UAE had a shorter but statistically insignificant duration of hospital stay (MD: -1.12, 95% CI: (-2.50 to 0.27), value 0.11, heterogeneity  = 96%) (value for subgroup differences = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis of approximately 196,595 patients demonstrates that myomectomy results in a significant reduction in re-intervention rate compared to UAE.

摘要

引言

子宫肌瘤是育龄期女性生殖道最常见的良性肿瘤。它们通常无症状,但可导致月经过多。治疗方法包括肌瘤切除术和子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)。后者是一种相对较新的手术,因此备受关注。

目的

我们对所有已发表的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,通过比较UAE与肌瘤切除术的结果,全面了解UAE的有效性。对电子数据库(PubMed和Cochrane中心)进行了系统检索,检索时间为2000年1月至2022年3月,以查找已发表的随机对照试验、观察性研究和荟萃分析,这些研究比较了UAE与肌瘤切除术在至少一项预先指定的结局方面的情况,即再次干预率、住院时间和并发症。

方法

我们筛选出九项研究进行最终分析。对于连续性结局,随机效应荟萃分析的结果以平均差(MDs)和相应的95%置信区间(CIs)表示。二分法结局的风险比(RRs)使用随机效应模型进行汇总。

结果

最终分析包括九项研究。对再次干预、住院和并发症等因素进行了评估,每个因素都有其独特的随访时间。汇总分析表明,与肌瘤切除术相比,UAE的再次干预率显著更高(RR:2.16,95%CI:(1.27 - 3.66),P值0.004,异质性 = 85%)。UAE发生主要并发症的风险更高,但无统计学意义(RR:0.62,95%CI:(0.29 - 1.33),P值0.22,异质性 = 0%),肌瘤切除术发生轻微并发症的风险在统计学上无显著差异(RR:1.72,95%CI:(0.92 - 3.22),P值0.09,异质性 = 0%)。UAE的住院时间较短,但无统计学意义(MD: - 1.12,95%CI:( - 2.50至0.27),P值0.11,异质性 = 96%)(亚组差异P值 = 0.005)。

结论

我们对约196,595例患者的荟萃分析表明,与UAE相比,肌瘤切除术可显著降低再次干预率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f500/11095175/37cd3639a68d/10.1177_20503121241236141-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验