Harada Fumi, Miyake Kentaro, Matsuyama Ryusei, Furuta Kazunori, Kida Mitsuhiro, Ohkawa Shinichi, Tanaka Jun-Ichi, Asakura Takeshi, Sugimori Kazuya, Kawaguchi Yoshiaki, Mine Tetsuya, Kubota Kazumi, Shimada Hiroshi, Endo Itaru
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
These authors contributed equally to this article.
World J Oncol. 2024 Jun;15(3):405-413. doi: 10.14740/wjon1821. Epub 2024 May 7.
There is little established evidence regarding treatment strategies for unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). This study aimed to clarify the situation of multidisciplinary treatment for unresectable BTC in the 2000s when there was no international standard first-line therapy.
We retrospectively reviewed 315 consecutive patients with unresectable BTC who had been treated at seven tertiary institutions in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan between 1999 and 2008.
The unresectable factors were as follows: locally advanced, 101 cases (32.1%); hematogenous metastases, 80 cases (25.4%); and peritoneal dissemination, 30 cases (9.5%). Chemotherapy or radiation therapy was administered to 218 patients (69.2%). The best supportive care was provided in 97 cases (30.8%). The most common regimen was gemcitabine monotherapy, followed by gemcitabine combination therapy and S-1 monotherapy. The 1- and 2-year survival rates of all patients were 34.6% and 12.2%, respectively. The median survival time (MST) was 8 months in all patients. The 1-year survival rate was 65%, and the MST was 12 months among the locally advanced patients, whereas patients with peritoneal dissemination had the worst outcome; the 1-year survival rate was 7%, and the MST was 5 months. Among treated 90 cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, patients who received chemoradiotherapy (n = 24) had a significantly better outcome than those who received chemotherapy alone (MST: 20 vs. 11 months, P < 0.001).
Unresectable BTC has heterogeneous treatment outcomes depending on the mode of tumor extension and location. Multidisciplinary treatment seems useful for patients with locally advanced BTC, whereas patients with metastatic disease still have a poor prognosis.
关于不可切除胆管癌(BTC)的治疗策略,现有证据较少。本研究旨在阐明21世纪初不可切除BTC多学科治疗的情况,当时尚无国际标准一线治疗方案。
我们回顾性分析了1999年至2008年期间在日本神奈川县7家三级医疗机构接受治疗的315例连续不可切除BTC患者。
不可切除因素如下:局部晚期,101例(32.1%);血行转移,80例(25.4%);腹膜播散,30例(9.5%)。218例患者(69.2%)接受了化疗或放疗。97例患者(30.8%)接受了最佳支持治疗。最常用的方案是吉西他滨单药治疗,其次是吉西他滨联合治疗和S-1单药治疗。所有患者的1年和2年生存率分别为34.6%和12.2%。所有患者的中位生存时间(MST)为8个月。局部晚期患者的1年生存率为65%,MST为12个月,而腹膜播散患者预后最差;1年生存率为7%,MST为5个月。在90例肝门部胆管癌治疗患者中,接受放化疗的患者(n = 24)的预后明显优于单纯接受化疗的患者(MST:20个月对11个月,P < 0.001)。
不可切除BTC的治疗结果因肿瘤扩展方式和部位而异。多学科治疗对局部晚期BTC患者似乎有用,而转移性疾病患者的预后仍然很差。