Mayiwar Lewend, Wan Kai Hin, Løhre Erik, Feldman Gilad
Department of Leadership and Organizational Behavior, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Apr;78(4):707-730. doi: 10.1177/17470218241255916. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
Kahneman and Tversky showed that when people make probability judgements, they tend to ignore relevant statistical information (e.g., sample size) and instead rely on a representativeness heuristic, whereby subjective probabilities are influenced by the degree to which a target is perceived as similar to (representative of) a typical example of the relevant population, class or category. Their article has become a cornerstone in many lines of research and has been used to account for various biases in judgement and decision-making. Despite the impact this article has had on theory and practice, there have been no direct replications. In a pre-registered experiment ( = 623; Amazon MTurk on CloudResearch), we conducted a replication and extensions of nine problems from Kahneman and Tversky's 1972 article. We successfully replicated eight out of the nine problems. We extended the replication by examining the consistency of heuristic responses across problems and by examining decision style as a predictor of participants' use of the representativeness heuristic. Materials, data, and code are available on: https://osf.io/nhqc4/.
卡尼曼和特沃斯基指出,当人们进行概率判断时,往往会忽略相关的统计信息(如样本大小),而是依赖代表性启发法,即主观概率受到目标被视为与相关总体、类别或范畴的典型例子相似(具有代表性)程度的影响。他们的文章已成为众多研究领域的基石,并被用于解释判断和决策中的各种偏差。尽管这篇文章对理论和实践产生了影响,但此前并无直接的重复验证研究。在一项预先注册的实验中(N = 623;通过CloudResearch平台在亚马逊土耳其机器人众包平台上进行),我们对卡尼曼和特沃斯基1972年文章中的九个问题进行了重复验证及拓展研究。九个问题中我们成功重复验证了八个。我们通过考察不同问题间启发式反应的一致性,并将决策风格作为参与者使用代表性启发法的预测指标,对重复验证进行了拓展。相关材料、数据及代码可在以下网址获取:https://osf.io/nhqc4/ 。