Stanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (P.S., A.W., N.Y., M.M., S.K., S.C., M.G.L., G.W.A.).
Neurology Department, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France (P.S.).
Stroke. 2024 Jun;55(6):1525-1534. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046694. Epub 2024 May 16.
Patients with acute ischemic stroke harboring a large vessel occlusion admitted to nonendovascular-capable centers often require interhospital transfer for thrombectomy. We evaluated the incidence and predictors of arterial recanalization during transfer, as well as the relationship between interhospital recanalization and clinical outcomes.
We analyzed data from 2 cohorts of patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion transferred for consideration of thrombectomy to a comprehensive center, with arterial imaging at the referring hospital and on comprehensive stroke center arrival. Interhospital recanalization was determined by comparison of the baseline and posttransfer arterial imaging and was defined as revised arterial occlusive lesion (rAOL) score 2b to 3. Pretransfer variables independently associated with interhospital recanalization were studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Of the 520 included patients (Montpellier, France, n=237; Stanford, United States, n=283), 111 (21%) experienced interhospital recanalization (partial [rAOL=2b] in 77% and complete [rAOL=3] in 23%). Pretransfer variables independently associated with recanalization were intravenous thrombolysis (adjusted odds ratio, 6.8 [95% CI, 4.0-11.6]), more distal occlusions (intracranial carotid occlusion as reference: adjusted odds ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.9-4.5] for proximal first segment of the middle cerebral artery, 5.1 [95% CI, 2.3-11.5] for distal first segment of the middle cerebral artery, and 5.0 [95% CI, 2.1-11.8] for second segment of the middle cerebral artery), and smaller clot burden (clot burden score 0-4 as reference: adjusted odds ratio, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.5-7.6] for 5-7 and 5.6 [95% CI, 2.4-12.7] for 8-9). Recanalization on arrival at the comprehensive center was associated with less interhospital infarct growth (rAOL, 0-2a: 11.6 mL; rAOL, 2b: 2.2 mL; rAOL, 3: 0.6 mL; <0.001) and greater interhospital National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score improvement (0 versus -5 versus -6; <0.001). Interhospital recanalization was associated with reduced 3-month disability (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.51 [95% CI, 1.68-3.77]) with greater benefit from complete than partial recanalization.
Recanalization is frequently observed during interhospital transfer for thrombectomy and is strongly associated with favorable outcomes, even when partial. Broadening thrombolysis indications in primary centers, and developing therapies that increase recanalization during transfer, will likely improve clinical outcomes.
在非血管内治疗能力的中心收治的急性缺血性脑卒中且存在大血管闭塞的患者,通常需要进行院内转移以进行血栓切除术。我们评估了在转移过程中动脉再通的发生率和预测因素,以及院内再通与临床结局之间的关系。
我们分析了 2 个队列的患者数据,这些患者的前循环大血管闭塞,被转诊到综合中心进行考虑血栓切除术治疗,在转诊医院和综合卒中中心到达时都进行了动脉成像。通过比较基线和转移后的动脉图像来确定院内再通,并将其定义为改良动脉闭塞病变(rAOL)评分 2b 至 3。使用多变量逻辑回归分析研究与院内再通相关的术前变量。
在 520 名纳入的患者中(法国蒙彼利埃,n=237;美国斯坦福,n=283),111 名(21%)发生了院内再通(部分 rAOL=2b 占 77%,完全 rAOL=3 占 23%)。与再通相关的术前变量是静脉溶栓治疗(校正比值比,6.8 [95%置信区间,4.0-11.6])、更靠近远段的闭塞(以颅内颈内动脉闭塞为参考:近端大脑中动脉第一段闭塞的校正比值比,2.0 [95%置信区间,0.9-4.5];大脑中动脉远段第一段闭塞的校正比值比,5.1 [95%置信区间,2.3-11.5];大脑中动脉第二段闭塞的校正比值比,5.0 [95%置信区间,2.1-11.8])和更小的血栓负荷(血栓负荷评分 0-4 为参考:5-7 的校正比值比,3.4 [95%置信区间,1.5-7.6];8-9 的校正比值比,5.6 [95%置信区间,2.4-12.7])。综合卒中中心到达时的再通与院内梗死进展减少(rAOL,0-2a:11.6 mL;rAOL,2b:2.2 mL;rAOL,3:0.6 mL;<0.001)和院内 NIHSS 评分改善更大(0 分与-5 分与-6 分;<0.001)相关。院内再通与 3 个月时的残疾程度降低有关(校正共同比值比,2.51 [95%置信区间,1.68-3.77]),完全再通比部分再通获益更大。
在进行血栓切除术的院内转移过程中,再通经常发生,与良好的结局密切相关,即使是部分再通。在初级中心扩大溶栓治疗的适应证,并开发能增加转移过程中再通的治疗方法,可能会改善临床结局。