Ter Schiphorst Adrien, Seners Pierre, Wouters Anke, Yuen Nicole, Mlynash Michael, Heit Jeremy J, Kemp Stephanie, Christensen Soren, Sablot Denis, Wacongne Anne, Lalu Thibault, Philippe Aude, Arquizan Caroline, Costalat Vincent, Albers Gregory W, Lansberg Maarten G
Stanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (A.t.S., P.S., N.Y., M.M., S.K., S.C., G.W.A., M.G.L.).
Neurology Department (A.t.S., C.A.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France.
Stroke. 2025 Jul;56(7):1909-1913. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.050758. Epub 2025 May 20.
For patients with acute ischemic stroke due to a large vessel occlusion admitted in primary stroke centers, helicopter transfer to comprehensive stroke centers is often used to expedite access to mechanical thrombectomy. Some studies have suggested that vibrations generated during helicopter transport might enhance intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the impact of helicopter transfer, compared with ground transportation, on interhospital recanalization and functional outcomes.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2 prospectively collected cohorts of anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke due to a large vessel occlusion patients transferred to 2 comprehensive stroke centers (Stanford, CA, November 2019 to January 2023, and Montpellier, France, January 2015 to January 2017) for mechanical thrombectomy consideration with arterial imaging both at the primary stroke center and on comprehensive stroke center arrival. The primary outcome was interhospital recanalization, determined by comparison of the baseline and posttransfer arterial imaging and defined as revised arterial occlusive lesion scores of 2b to 3. The association between transportation mode (helicopter versus ground) and interhospital recanalization was studied in logistic regression analysis, adjusting for pretransfer IVT use, occlusion site, and transfer duration.
Among 520 included patients, 315 (61%) were transferred by helicopter and 259 (50%) received IVT before transfer. Interhospital recanalization rates were similar between helicopter and ground transfers in both the overall cohort (23% versus 19%; =0.30) and the IVT subgroup (36% versus 33%; =0.61). Adjusted analyses confirmed no association between helicopter transport and interhospital recanalization (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.72-2.11]; =0.44). Favorable 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) rates were also similar between helicopter and ground transfers in both unadjusted (35% versus 40%; =0.29) and adjusted analyses (adjusted odds ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.67-1.88]; =0.67).
In this multicenter observational cohort study, helicopter transfer was not associated with improved interhospital recanalization or favorable functional outcomes compared with ground transport. These findings do not support the hypothesis that vibrations during helicopter transport enhance IVT efficacy.
对于在初级卒中中心就诊的因大血管闭塞导致急性缺血性卒中的患者,直升机转运至综合卒中中心常被用于加快机械取栓治疗的进程。一些研究表明,直升机转运过程中产生的震动可能会提高静脉溶栓(IVT)的疗效。我们旨在评估与地面转运相比,直升机转运对院间再通和功能结局的影响。
我们对前瞻性收集的2组因大血管闭塞导致前循环急性缺血性卒中患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者被转运至2个综合卒中中心(美国加利福尼亚州斯坦福,2019年11月至2023年1月;法国蒙彼利埃,2015年1月至2017年1月)以考虑进行机械取栓,并在初级卒中中心和抵达综合卒中中心时均进行了动脉成像。主要结局是院间再通,通过比较基线和转运后的动脉成像来确定,定义为改良动脉闭塞病变评分为2b至3分。在逻辑回归分析中研究了转运方式(直升机与地面)与院间再通之间的关联,并对转运前IVT的使用、闭塞部位和转运时间进行了调整。
在纳入的520例患者中,315例(61%)通过直升机转运,259例(50%)在转运前接受了IVT。在整个队列中,直升机转运和地面转运的院间再通率相似(分别为23%和19%;P = 0.30),在IVT亚组中也相似(分别为36%和33%;P = 0.61)。校正分析证实直升机转运与院间再通之间无关联(校正比值比,1.23 [95% CI,0.72 - 2.11];P = 0.44)。在未校正(分别为35%和40%;P = 0.29)和校正分析(校正比值比,1.12 [95% CI,0.67 - 1.88];P = 0.67)中,直升机转运和地面转运的3个月良好功能结局(改良Rankin量表评分,0 - 2分)率也相似。
在这项多中心观察性队列研究中,与地面转运相比,直升机转运与院间再通改善或良好功能结局无关。这些发现不支持直升机转运过程中的震动会提高IVT疗效这一假设。