Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, AU Viborg-Research Centre Foulum, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, AU Viborg-Research Centre Foulum, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Sep;107(9):6771-6784. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24414. Epub 2024 May 15.
Automated measurements of the ratio of concentrations of methane and carbon dioxide, [CH]:[CO], in breath from individual animals (the so-called "sniffer technique") and estimated CO production can be used to estimate CH production, provided that CO production can be reliably calculated. This would allow CH production from individual cows to be estimated in large cohorts of cows, whereby ranking of cows according to their CH production might become possible and their values could be used for breeding of low CH-emitting animals. Estimates of CO production are typically based on predictions of heat production, which can be calculated from body weight (BW), energy-corrected milk yield, and days of pregnancy. The objectives of the present study were to develop predictions of CO production directly from milk production, dietary, and animal variables, and furthermore to develop different models to be used for different scenarios, depending on available data. An international dataset with 2,244 records from individual lactating cows including CO production and associated traits, as dry matter intake (DMI), diet composition, BW, milk production and composition, days in milk, and days pregnant, was compiled to constitute the training dataset. Research location and experiment nested within research location were included as random intercepts. The method of CO production measurement (respiration chamber [RC] or GreenFeed [GF]) was confounded with research location, and therefore excluded from the model. In total, 3 models were developed based on the current training dataset: model 1 ("best model"), where all significant traits were included; model 2 ("on-farm model"), where DMI was excluded; and model 3 ("reduced on-farm model"), where both DMI and BW were excluded. Evaluation on test dat sets with either RC data (n = 103), GF data without additives (n = 478), or GF data only including observations where nitrate, 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP), or a combination of nitrate and 3-NOP were fed to the cows (GF+: n = 295), showed good precision of the 3 models, illustrated by low slope bias both in absolute values (-0.22 to 0.097) and in percentage (0.049 to 4.89) of mean square error (MSE). However, the mean bias (MB) indicated systematic overprediction and underprediction of CO production when the models were evaluated on the GF and the RC test datasets, respectively. To address this bias, the 3 models were evaluated on a modified test dataset, where the CO production (g/d) was adjusted by subtracting (where measurements were obtained by RC) or adding absolute MB (where measurements were obtained by GF) from evaluation of the specific model on RC, GF, and GF+ test datasets. With this modification, the absolute values of MB and MB as percentage of MSE became negligible. In conclusion, the 3 models were precise in predicting CO production from lactating dairy cows.
自动测量个体动物呼气中甲烷和二氧化碳浓度的比值[CH]:[CO](所谓的“嗅探技术”),并估算 CO 产量,可用于估算 CH 产量,前提是 CO 产量可通过可靠计算得出。这将允许在大量奶牛群体中估算个体奶牛的 CH 产量,从而有可能根据 CH 产量对奶牛进行排名,并利用这些值进行低 CH 排放动物的选育。CO 产量的估算通常基于对产热的预测,产热可以根据体重(BW)、能量校正奶产量和妊娠天数来计算。本研究的目的是直接从奶产量、饮食和动物变量中开发 CO 产量的预测模型,并进一步开发适用于不同情况的不同模型,具体取决于可用数据。编译了一个包含 2244 条个体泌乳奶牛记录的国际数据集,其中包括 CO 产量和相关特征,如干物质采食量(DMI)、饮食组成、BW、奶产量和组成、泌乳天数和妊娠天数,作为训练数据集。研究地点和嵌套在研究地点内的实验被包含为随机截距。CO 产量测量方法(呼吸室[RC]或 GreenFeed[GF])与研究地点混杂,因此被排除在模型之外。总共基于当前的训练数据集开发了 3 个模型:模型 1(“最佳模型”),其中包含所有显著特征;模型 2(“农场模型”),其中排除了 DMI;模型 3(“简化农场模型”),其中同时排除了 DMI 和 BW。在包含 RC 数据的测试数据集(n=103)、不包含添加剂的 GF 数据(n=478)或仅包含向奶牛投喂硝酸盐、3-硝基氧基丙醇(3-NOP)或硝酸盐和 3-NOP 组合的 GF 数据(GF+:n=295)上进行评估,表明 3 个模型的精度较高,绝对斜率偏差较小(绝对值在-0.22 到 0.097 之间,百分比在 0.049 到 4.89 之间)均方根误差(MSE)。然而,当模型分别在 GF 和 RC 测试数据集上进行评估时,平均偏差(MB)表明 CO 产量存在系统的高估和低估。为了解决这一偏差,将 3 个模型在修改后的测试数据集上进行评估,其中通过从 RC 测量值中减去(通过 RC 获得测量值的情况)或添加绝对 MB(通过 GF 获得测量值的情况),对特定模型在 RC、GF 和 GF+测试数据集上的评估结果进行调整。通过这种修改,MB 的绝对值和作为 MSE 百分比的 MB 变得可以忽略不计。总之,这 3 个模型在预测泌乳奶牛的 CO 产量方面非常精确。