School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e081619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081619.
To outline and examine what evidence exists related to nurses' and midwives' experiences of participating in clinical supervision.
The practice of clinical supervision is increasingly prevalent in nursing and midwifery, yet disparity remains in relation to professionals' understanding and experience of this clinical support and how it is implemented in practice. This scoping review will identify the available evidence and gaps in knowledge that exist in relation to nurses' and midwives' experience of this practice and examine how the various forms are defined in the literature.
Comprehensive searches of CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will be carried out. Grey literature will also be searched and all results will be screened independently by two reviewers using identified inclusion and exclusion criteria. All empirical data that identify and report nurses' and midwives' experiences of clinical supervision will be included in the review. Studies that include other health and social care professionals will be excluded where the nursing and midwifery cohort is not reported independently. Data from all relevant studies will be extracted using a validated adapted data extraction form. Our review will be guided by the Joanne Briggs Institute Methodology and findings will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews statement.
This review does not require ethical approval. Our dissemination strategy includes peer-reviewed publication, presentation and conferences and sharing through stakeholder networks.
概述并检查现有关于护士和助产士参与临床监督的经验的证据。
临床监督实践在护理和助产中越来越普遍,但专业人员对这种临床支持的理解和经验以及在实践中如何实施仍存在差异。本范围综述将确定与护士和助产士对这种实践的经验相关的现有证据和知识差距,并研究文献中如何定义各种形式的临床监督。
将全面搜索 CINAHL Complete、MEDLINE(EBSCO)、PsycINFO(EBSCO)、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library。还将搜索灰色文献,使用确定的纳入和排除标准,由两名评审员独立筛选所有结果。所有确定并报告护士和助产士临床监督经验的实证数据都将纳入审查。如果护理和助产队列未独立报告,则将排除包含其他卫生和社会保健专业人员的研究。将使用经过验证的改编数据提取表格从所有相关研究中提取数据。我们的综述将遵循 Joanne Briggs 研究所的方法,研究结果将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析协议扩展用于范围综述的报告。
本综述不需要伦理批准。我们的传播策略包括同行评议的出版物、演讲和会议,并通过利益相关者网络进行分享。