• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规性在中国隐喻理解中起作用,但在明喻理解中不起作用:来自事件相关电位的证据。

Conventionality matters in Chinese metaphor but not simile comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.

作者信息

Yu Yan, Gu Feng, Li Yongqing, Han Jianghua

机构信息

Neurocognitive Laboratory for Linguistics and Semiotics, College of Literature and Journalism, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Digital Convergence Laboratory of Chinese Cultural Inheritance and Global Communication, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 May 2;15:1404498. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1404498. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1404498
PMID:38756492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11097955/
Abstract

Metaphor and simile, two prevalent forms of figurative language widely employed in daily communication, serve as significant research subjects in linguistics. The Career of Metaphor Theory in cognitive linguistics posits that as conventionality increases, the cognitive mechanisms of metaphor comprehension shift from "comparison" to "categorization." In line with this notion, prior electrophysiological investigations have revealed that novel metaphors elicit a stronger N400 brain response compared to conventional metaphors. However, the observed N400 difference between conventional and novel metaphors may merely stem from the familiarity contrast between them, as conventional metaphors are typically more familiar than novel ones. To address this dichotomy, the present study not only compared the N400 responses between conventional and novel metaphors but also between conventional and novel similes. While conventional and novel similes differ in familiarity, similar to conventional and novel metaphors, both are processed via "comparison" mechanisms. The results revealed that novel metaphors elicited larger N400 amplitudes compared to conventional metaphors, aligning with previous findings. In contrast, no significant N400 differences were observed between conventional and novel similes, suggesting that familiarity disparity is unlikely to account for N400 distinctions. Our findings imply that conventional and novel metaphors undergo distinct cognitive processing mechanisms ("comparison" versus "categorization"), thereby providing further empirical validation for the Career of Metaphor Theory.

摘要

隐喻和明喻是日常交流中广泛使用的两种常见的比喻语言形式,是语言学中的重要研究对象。认知语言学中的隐喻生涯理论认为,随着常规性的增加,隐喻理解的认知机制从“比较”转变为“分类”。与此观点一致,先前的电生理研究表明,与常规隐喻相比,新颖隐喻会引发更强的N400脑反应。然而,常规隐喻和新颖隐喻之间观察到的N400差异可能仅仅源于它们之间的熟悉度差异,因为常规隐喻通常比新颖隐喻更熟悉。为了解决这一二分法,本研究不仅比较了常规隐喻和新颖隐喻之间的N400反应,还比较了常规明喻和新颖明喻之间的N400反应。虽然常规明喻和新颖明喻在熟悉度上存在差异,与常规隐喻和新颖隐喻类似,但两者都是通过“比较”机制进行处理的。结果表明,与常规隐喻相比,新颖隐喻引发的N400波幅更大,这与先前的研究结果一致。相比之下,常规明喻和新颖明喻之间未观察到显著的N400差异,这表明熟悉度差异不太可能解释N400的差异。我们的研究结果表明,常规隐喻和新颖隐喻经历了不同的认知加工机制(“比较”与“分类”),从而为隐喻生涯理论提供了进一步的实证验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f932/11097955/715ceea96362/fpsyg-15-1404498-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f932/11097955/751b36a9e853/fpsyg-15-1404498-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f932/11097955/4989d0481c98/fpsyg-15-1404498-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f932/11097955/e2039414f38b/fpsyg-15-1404498-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f932/11097955/715ceea96362/fpsyg-15-1404498-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f932/11097955/751b36a9e853/fpsyg-15-1404498-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f932/11097955/4989d0481c98/fpsyg-15-1404498-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f932/11097955/e2039414f38b/fpsyg-15-1404498-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f932/11097955/715ceea96362/fpsyg-15-1404498-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Conventionality matters in Chinese metaphor but not simile comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.常规性在中国隐喻理解中起作用,但在明喻理解中不起作用:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 2;15:1404498. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1404498. eCollection 2024.
2
A simile is (like) a metaphor: Comparing metaphor and simile processing across the familiarity spectrum.明喻像隐喻:在熟悉度范围内比较隐喻和明喻的处理过程。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2021 Jun;75(2):182-188. doi: 10.1037/cep0000242. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors.ERP 研究证据表明,在理解常规隐喻和新颖隐喻时,存在概念映射和比较过程。
Brain Lang. 2013 Dec;127(3):484-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
4
Does simile comprehension differ from metaphor comprehension? A functional MRI study.比喻理解是否不同于明喻理解?一项 fMRI 研究。
Brain Lang. 2012 Jun;121(3):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
5
Semantic properties, aptness, familiarity, conventionality, and interpretive diversity scores for 84 metaphors and similes.84个隐喻和明喻的语义属性、恰当性、熟悉度、常规性及解释多样性得分
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Sep;47(3):800-12. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0502-y.
6
Bilingualism Effects in Metaphor and Simile Comprehension and Production in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.双语对自闭症谱系障碍儿童隐喻和明喻理解与生成的影响。
Autism Res. 2025 Mar;18(3):632-647. doi: 10.1002/aur.70009. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
7
Bilingual Processing Mechanisms of Scientific Metaphors and Conventional Metaphors: Evidence a Contrastive Event-Related Potentials Study.科学隐喻和传统隐喻的双语加工机制:一项对比事件相关电位研究的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;13:894114. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894114. eCollection 2022.
8
Killing a novel metaphor and reviving a dead one: ERP correlates of metaphor conventionalization.杀死一个新颖的隐喻,复活一个死去的隐喻:ERP 关联的隐喻常规化。
Brain Lang. 2012 Nov;123(2):137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
9
Are metaphors elliptical similes?隐喻是省略的明喻吗?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2000 Jul;29(4):371-98. doi: 10.1023/a:1005103211670.
10
Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: an ERP study.理解传统隐喻与新颖隐喻:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2009 Aug 11;1284:145-55. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.088. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Bilingualism Effects in Metaphor and Simile Comprehension and Production in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.双语对自闭症谱系障碍儿童隐喻和明喻理解与生成的影响。
Autism Res. 2025 Mar;18(3):632-647. doi: 10.1002/aur.70009. Epub 2025 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-trial neurodynamics reveal N400 and P600 coupling in language comprehension.单次试验神经动力学揭示了语言理解中的N400和P600耦合。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Dec;18(6):3309-3325. doi: 10.1007/s11571-023-09983-7. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
Normed dataset for novel metaphors, novel similes, literal and anomalous sentences in Chinese.用于中文中新颖隐喻、新颖明喻、字面语句和异常语句的规范数据集。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 1;13:922722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922722. eCollection 2022.
3
Hemispheric Processing of Chinese Scientific Metaphors: Evidence Hemifield Presentation.
中文科学隐喻的半球加工:来自半视野呈现的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:894715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894715. eCollection 2022.
4
Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension.事件相关电位指标反映语言理解过程中的词汇提取(N400)和整合(P600)。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Oct;135:103569. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
5
The temporal dynamics underlying the comprehension of scientific metaphors and poetic metaphors.理解科学隐喻和诗意隐喻背后的时间动态。
Brain Res. 2017 Jan 15;1655:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
6
Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction.隐喻:连接具象与抽象。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1080-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0861-0.
7
Repeated Exposure to "meaningless" Pseudowords Modulates LPC, but Not N(FN)400.反复接触“无意义”假词会调节晚期正成分(LPC),但不会调节N(FN)400。
Brain Topogr. 2015 Nov;28(6):838-51. doi: 10.1007/s10548-014-0403-5. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
8
ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors.ERP 研究证据表明,在理解常规隐喻和新颖隐喻时,存在概念映射和比较过程。
Brain Lang. 2013 Dec;127(3):484-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
9
A piece of the action: modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors.参与其中:动作成语和隐喻对感觉运动区域的调节。
Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.044. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
10
She runs, the road runs, my mind runs, bad blood runs between us: literal and figurative motion verbs: an fMRI study.她奔跑,道路延伸,我的思绪飞驰,我们之间流淌着不和:字面意义和比喻意义的动作动词:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:361-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.050. Epub 2013 Jun 20.