Neri Bruno, Callara Alejandro Luis, Vanello Nicola, Menicucci Danilo, Zaccaro Andrea, Piarulli Andrea, Laurino Marco, Norbu Ngawang, Kechok Jampa, Sherab Ngawang, Gemignani Angelo
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Research Center "E. Piaggio", University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2024 May 2;15:1348317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1348317. eCollection 2024.
The positive effects of meditation on human wellbeing are indisputable, ranging from emotion regulation improvement to stress reduction and present-moment awareness enhancement. Changes in brain activity regulate and support these phenomena. However, the heterogeneity of meditation practices and their cultural background, as well as their poor categorization limit the generalization of results to all types of meditation. Here, we took advantage of a collaboration with the very singular and precious community of the Monks and Geshes of the Tibetan University of Sera-Jey in India to study the neural correlates of the two main types of meditation recognized in Tibetan Buddhism, namely concentrative and analytical meditation. Twenty-three meditators with different levels of expertise underwent to an ecological (i.e., within the monastery) EEG acquisition consisting of an analytical and/or concentrative meditation session at "their best," and with the only constraint of performing a 5-min-long baseline at the beginning of the session. Time-varying power-spectral-density estimates of each session were compared against the baseline (i.e., within session) and between conditions (i.e., analytical vs. concentrative). Our results showed that concentrative meditation elicited more numerous and marked changes in the EEG power compared to analytical meditation, and mainly in the form of an increase in the theta, alpha and beta frequency ranges. Moreover, the full immersion in the Monastery life allowed to share the results and discuss their interpretation with the best scholars of the Monastic University, ensuring the identification of the most expert meditators, as well as to highlight better the differences between the different types of meditation practiced by each of them.
冥想对人类幸福的积极影响是无可争议的,从改善情绪调节到减轻压力以及增强当下意识。大脑活动的变化调节并支持这些现象。然而,冥想练习及其文化背景的异质性,以及它们分类不佳,限制了将结果推广到所有类型的冥想。在这里,我们利用与印度色拉哲蚌寺藏传佛教大学非常独特且珍贵的僧伽团体合作的机会,研究藏传佛教中认可的两种主要冥想类型,即专注冥想和分析冥想的神经关联。23名具有不同专业水平的冥想者在生态环境(即在寺院内部)中进行了脑电图采集,包括在“他们最佳状态”下进行的分析性和/或专注性冥想课程,且唯一的限制是在课程开始时进行5分钟的基线测量。将每个课程的时变功率谱密度估计值与基线(即课程内)以及不同条件(即分析性冥想与专注性冥想)之间进行比较。我们的结果表明,与分析性冥想相比,专注性冥想在脑电图功率方面引发了更多且更显著的变化,主要表现为θ波、α波和β波频率范围内的增加。此外,完全融入寺院生活使得能够与寺院大学最优秀的学者分享结果并讨论其解释,确保识别出最专业的冥想者,同时也更突出了他们各自所练习的不同类型冥想之间的差异。