Suppr超能文献

太少、太迟、且位置不对:α 波段活动并不能反映选择性注意的主动机制。

Too little, too late, and in the wrong place: Alpha band activity does not reflect an active mechanism of selective attention.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UB, United Kingdom.

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UB, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:117006. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117006. Epub 2020 May 30.

Abstract

Selective attention focuses visual processing on relevant stimuli in order to allow for adaptive behaviour despite an abundance of distracting information. It has been proposed that increases in alpha band (8-12 ​Hz) amplitude reflect an active mechanism for distractor suppression. If this were the case, increases in alpha band amplitude should be succeeded by a decrease in distractor processing. Surprisingly, this connection has not been tested directly; specifically, studies that have investigated changes in alpha band after attention-directing cues have not directly assessed the neuronal processing of distractors. We concurrently recorded alpha activity and steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) to assess the processing of target and distractor stimuli. In two experiments, participants covertly shifted attention to one of two letter streams (left or right) to detect infrequent target letters 'X' while ignoring the other stream. In line with previous findings, alpha band amplitudes contralateral to the unattended location increased compared to a pre-cue baseline. However, there was no suppression of SSVEP amplitudes elicited by unattended stimuli, while there was a pronounced enhancement of SSVEPs elicited by attended stimuli. Furthermore, and crucially, changes in alpha band amplitude during attention shifts did not precede those in SSVEPs and hit rates in both experiments, indicating that changes in alpha band amplitudes are likely to be a consequence of attention shifts rather than the other way around. We conclude that these findings contradict the notion that alpha band activity reflects mechanisms that have a causal role in the allocation of selective attention.

摘要

选择性注意将视觉处理集中在相关刺激上,以便在大量干扰信息的情况下进行适应性行为。有人提出,α 频段(8-12 Hz)振幅的增加反映了主动抑制干扰的机制。如果是这样,α 频段振幅的增加应该伴随着干扰处理的减少。令人惊讶的是,这一联系尚未被直接测试;具体来说,那些研究在注意引导线索后 α 频段变化的研究并没有直接评估干扰物的神经元处理。我们同时记录了α 活动和稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP),以评估目标和干扰刺激的处理。在两项实验中,参与者在两个字母流(左或右)之间进行隐蔽的注意力转移,以检测不常见的目标字母“X”,同时忽略另一个流。与之前的发现一致,与未注意位置相对的α 频段振幅与预提示基线相比增加。然而,未注意刺激诱发的 SSVEP 振幅没有受到抑制,而注意刺激诱发的 SSVEP 则明显增强。此外,至关重要的是,在注意力转移期间,α 频段振幅的变化并没有先于 SSVEP 和两项实验中的击中率发生,这表明α 频段振幅的变化很可能是注意力转移的结果,而不是相反。我们的结论是,这些发现与 α 频段活动反映了在选择性注意分配中具有因果作用的机制的观点相矛盾。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验