Werner Oscar, Martins Duarte, Bertini Federico, Bennati Elena, Collia Dario, Olivotto Iacopo, Spaziani Gaia, Baruteau Alban-Elouen, Pedrizzetti Gianni, Raimondi Francesca
Pediatric Cardiology Unit, University Hospital Meyer, Florence, Italy.
Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, FHU PRECICARE, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 2;11:1388171. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1388171. eCollection 2024.
Advancements in cardiac imaging have revolutionized our understanding of ventricular contraction. While ejection fraction (EF) is still the gold standard parameter to assess left ventricle (LV) function, strain imaging (SI) has provided valuable insights into ventricular mechanics. The lack of an integrative method including SI parameters in a single, validated formula may limit its use. Our aim was to compare different methods for evaluating global circumferential strain (GCS) and their relationship with global longitudinal strain (GLS) and EF in CMR and how the different evaluations fit in the theoretical relationship between EF and global strain.
Retrospective monocenter study. Inclusion of every patient who underwent a CMR during a 15 months period with various clinical indication (congenital heart defect, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy). A minimum of three LV long-axis planes and a stack of short-axis slices covering the LV using classical steady-state free precession cine sequences. A single assessment of GLS on long axis (LAX) slices and a double assessment of GCS and EF with both short axis (SAX) and LAX slices were made by a single experienced CMR investigator.
GCS-SAX and GCS-LAX were correlated ( = 0.77, < 0.001) without being interchangeable with a high reproducibility for GCS, GLS and EF. EF calculated from LAX images showed an overestimation compared to EF derived from SAX images of 7%. The correlation between calculated EF and theoretical EF derived from SI was high ( = 0.88 with EF-SAX, 0.95 with EF-LAX).
This study highlights the need to integrate strain imaging techniques into clinical by incorporating strain parameters into EF calculations, because it gives a deeper understanding of cardiac mechanics.
心脏成像技术的进步彻底改变了我们对心室收缩的理解。虽然射血分数(EF)仍然是评估左心室(LV)功能的金标准参数,但应变成像(SI)为心室力学提供了有价值的见解。缺乏一种将SI参数纳入单一有效公式的综合方法可能会限制其应用。我们的目的是比较评估整体圆周应变(GCS)的不同方法及其与心脏磁共振成像(CMR)中整体纵向应变(GLS)和EF的关系,以及不同评估方法如何符合EF与整体应变之间的理论关系。
回顾性单中心研究。纳入在15个月期间因各种临床指征(先天性心脏病、心肌炎、心肌病)接受CMR检查的每一位患者。使用经典稳态自由进动电影序列,至少获取三个左心室长轴平面以及覆盖左心室的一系列短轴切片。由一名经验丰富的CMR研究人员对长轴(LAX)切片进行一次GLS评估,并对短轴(SAX)和LAX切片进行两次GCS和EF评估。
GCS-SAX和GCS-LAX具有相关性(=0.77,<0.001),但不可互换,GCS、GLS和EF具有较高的可重复性。与从SAX图像得出的EF相比,从LAX图像计算得出的EF高估了7%。计算得出的EF与从SI得出的理论EF之间的相关性较高(EF-SAX时=0.88,EF-LAX时=0.95)。
本研究强调了通过将应变参数纳入EF计算,将应变成像技术整合到临床中的必要性,因为这能更深入地理解心脏力学。