• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can requests for real-world evidence by the French HTA body be planned? An exhaustive retrospective case-control study of medicinal products appraisals from 2016 to 2021.法国 HTA 机构对真实世界证据的需求能否进行规划?一项针对 2016 年至 2021 年药品评估的详尽回顾性病例对照研究。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 May 17;40(1):e33. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000291.
2
Comparative Assessment of Reimbursement Recommendations by NICE and HAS for Oncology New Medicines Indicated for the Treatment of Solid Tumors from 2015 to 2021.2015 年至 2021 年,NICE 和 HAS 对肿瘤新药治疗实体瘤的报销建议进行比较评估。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):961-972. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231188073. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
3
FACTORS INFLUENCING REIMBURSEMENT OF MEDICAL DEVICES IN FRANCE.影响法国医疗器械报销的因素
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(6):399-406. doi: 10.1017/S0266462315000707. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Associations between uncertainties identified by the European Medicines Agency and national decision making on reimbursement by HTA agencies.欧洲药品管理局确定的不确定性与 HTA 机构的国家报销决策之间的关联。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul;14(4):1566-1577. doi: 10.1111/cts.13027. Epub 2021 May 1.
5
Opportunities to improve the adoption of health-related quality of life evidence as part of the French Health Technology Assessment process.提高健康相关生活质量证据在法国卫生技术评估过程中应用的机会。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 19;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01081-8.
6
The maze of real-world evidence frameworks: from a desert to a jungle! An environmental scan and comparison across regulatory and health technology assessment agencies.真实世界证据框架的迷宫:从沙漠到丛林!监管机构和卫生技术评估机构的环境扫描和比较。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Sep;13(9):e240061. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0061. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
7
Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework.基于组织学的癌症药物建模方法,为 NICE 评估提供信息:系统评价和决策框架。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(76):1-228. doi: 10.3310/hta25760.
8
Value assessment of medicinal products by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and French National Authority for Health (HAS): Similarities and discrepancies.意大利药品管理局(AIFA)和法国国家卫生管理局(HAS)对药品的价值评估:异同点
Front Med Technol. 2022 Sep 5;4:917151. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.917151. eCollection 2022.
9
TRUST4RD: tool for reducing uncertainties in the evidence generation for specialised treatments for rare diseases.TRUST4RD:用于减少罕见病专业治疗证据生成中不确定性的工具。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 May 26;15(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01370-3.
10
[Haute Autorite de sante opinion on cost-effectiveness of health products : results and perspectives].[法国国家卫生管理局关于健康产品成本效益的意见:结果与展望]
Sante Publique. 2015 Sep-Oct;27(5):691-700.

引用本文的文献

1
Planning Post-Launch Evidence Generation: Lessons From France, England and Spain.规划上市后证据生成:来自法国、英国和西班牙的经验教训。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Apr;117(4):961-966. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3586. Epub 2025 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Replacing RCTs with real world data for regulatory decision making: a self-fulfilling prophecy?用真实世界数据取代随机对照试验用于监管决策:自我实现的预言?
BMJ. 2023 Mar 2;380:e073100. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073100.
2
Rapid access to innovative medicinal products while ensuring relevant health technology assessment. Position of the French National Authority for Health.在确保进行相关卫生技术评估的同时,快速获取创新药品。法国国家卫生管理局的立场。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):1-5. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112091.
3
Postlaunch evidence generation practices among health technology assessment bodies in Europe.欧洲卫生技术评估机构的上市后证据生成实践。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Apr 19;38(1):e33. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000174.
4
Paying for Cancer Drugs That Prove Their Benefit.为已证明有效的抗癌药物付费。
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1579-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18308.
5
A Middle Ground for Accelerated Drug Approval-Lessons From Aducanumab.加速药物批准的中间立场——来自阿杜卡努单抗的经验教训
JAMA. 2021 Oct 12;326(14):1367-1368. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.14861.
6
The Evolution of AIFA Registries to Support Managed Entry Agreements for Orphan Medicinal Products in Italy.意大利药品审评局(AIFA)注册系统的演变,以支持孤儿药品的有条件批准协议。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 10;12:699466. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.699466. eCollection 2021.
7
Implementing Outcomes-Based Managed Entry Agreements for Rare Disease Treatments: Nusinersen and Tisagenlecleucel.实施基于结果的罕见病治疗管理准入协议:诺西那生钠和Tisagenlecleucel。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Sep;39(9):1021-1044. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01050-5. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
8
Research and Reporting Considerations for Observational Studies Using Electronic Health Record Data.利用电子健康记录数据进行观察性研究的研究和报告注意事项。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11 Suppl):S79-S84. doi: 10.7326/M19-0873.
9
Managed Entry Agreements: Policy Analysis From the European Perspective.管理准入协议:欧洲视角的政策分析。
Value Health. 2020 Apr;23(4):425-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.12.008.
10
Risk sharing in managed entry agreements-A review of the Swedish experience.管理准入协议中的风险分担-瑞典经验回顾。
Health Policy. 2020 Apr;124(4):404-410. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

法国 HTA 机构对真实世界证据的需求能否进行规划?一项针对 2016 年至 2021 年药品评估的详尽回顾性病例对照研究。

Can requests for real-world evidence by the French HTA body be planned? An exhaustive retrospective case-control study of medicinal products appraisals from 2016 to 2021.

机构信息

HTA Department, Haute Autorité de Santé, La Plaine Saint-Denis, France.

Scientific Board and Chairman of the Transparency Committee, Haute Autorité de Santé, La Plaine Saint-Denis, France.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 May 17;40(1):e33. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000291.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462324000291
PMID:38757153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11569913/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In France, decisions for pricing and reimbursement for medicinal products are based on appraisals performed by the National authority for health ( (HAS)). During the appraisal process, additional real-world evidence can be requested as "Post-Registration Studies" (PRS) when there are uncertainties in evidence that could be resolved by additional data collection. To facilitate PRS planning, a retrospective exploratory analysis was conducted to identify the characteristics of medicinal products associated with a PRS request.

METHODS

This analysis encompassed all appraisals finalized between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021 and compared products for which the appraisal led to a PRS request with those that did not.

RESULTS

Six hundred positive opinions for reimbursement were identified, with a PRS request present in 17 percent (n = 103) of cases. The independent characteristics associated with a PRS request were a mild or moderate clinical benefit score, a major to moderate or minor clinical added value score, previous availability under an early access program, and certain therapeutic areas (neurology, pulmonology, and endocrinology). These findings suggest two different profiles of PRS requests: (i) products for which there is uncertainty in the size of the clinical benefit and (ii) innovative products for which a substantial benefit is expected but uncertainties persist.

CONCLUSIONS

These results will assist health technology developers to better anticipate data generation to promptly address uncertainties identified by HAS. It may also help HAS and other assessment agencies to work together to improve postlaunch evidence generation according to the characteristics of the medicinal products.

摘要

目的

在法国,药品的定价和报销决策基于国家卫生管理局( HAS )进行的评估。在评估过程中,如果证据中存在不确定性,可以通过额外的数据收集来解决,那么可以请求“注册后研究”(PRS)作为额外的真实世界证据。为了方便 PRS 计划的制定,进行了一项回顾性探索性分析,以确定与 PRS 请求相关的药品特征。

方法

本分析包括 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间完成的所有评估,并将导致 PRS 请求的评估产品与未导致 PRS 请求的评估产品进行了比较。

结果

共确定了 600 份有报销的正面意见,其中 17%(n=103)的病例提出了 PRS 请求。与 PRS 请求相关的独立特征是轻度或中度临床获益评分、主要到中度或轻度临床附加价值评分、先前在早期准入计划下可用以及某些治疗领域(神经病学、肺病学和内分泌学)。这些发现表明 PRS 请求有两种不同的模式:(i)临床获益大小存在不确定性的产品;(ii)预期有重大获益但仍存在不确定性的创新产品。

结论

这些结果将帮助卫生技术开发者更好地预测数据生成,以便及时解决 HAS 确定的不确定性。它还可以帮助 HAS 和其他评估机构根据药品的特点共同努力,改善上市后证据生成。