Universitat de València (Spain).
Lunds Universitet (Sweden).
Span J Psychol. 2024 May 17;27:e13. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2024.14.
The apparently contradictory co-existence of high levels of gender equality and intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) found in Nordic countries has been termed the Nordic Paradox. The aim of this study was to examine how the Nordic Paradox is discussed and explained by Spanish professionals working in the IPVAW field. Five focus groups ( = 19) and interviews with key informants ( = 10) were conducted. Four main categories of possible explanations for the Nordic Paradox were identified: (i.e., discordance between individual beliefs and behaviors and macro-social norms of gender equality), (i.e., IPVAW defined as a multicausal phenomenon that does not necessarily have to be associated with gender equality), (i.e., the role of social relationships and the way people relate to each other in the Nordic countries), and (i.e., men's reaction to greater equality for women). Although this study does not provide a final explanation for the Nordic paradox, its results provide us with a better understanding of the phenomenon and can help to advance research in this field.
北欧国家中存在高水平的性别平等与针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力(IPVAW)共存的明显矛盾现象被称为“北欧悖论”。本研究旨在探讨在 IPVAW 领域工作的西班牙专业人员如何讨论和解释这一悖论。进行了五次焦点小组(= 19)和对关键信息提供者的访谈(= 10)。确定了四种可能解释北欧悖论的主要类别:(i)个人信念和行为与性别平等的宏观社会规范之间的不和谐;(ii)将 IPVAW 定义为一种多因性现象,不一定与性别平等相关;(iii)北欧国家中社会关系和人们相互关系的作用;(iv)男性对女性更大平等的反应。尽管本研究并未为北欧悖论提供最终解释,但研究结果使我们对这一现象有了更好的理解,并有助于推动该领域的研究。