• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝伐单抗联合替莫唑胺治疗胶质瘤的临床疗效

Clinical Efficacy of Bevacizumab Combined with Temozolomide in Treating Gliomas.

作者信息

Li Puxian, Qi Aihong, Li Qiang

出版信息

Altern Ther Health Med. 2025 Jul;31(4):284-288.

PMID:38758157
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical efficacy of bevacizumab (BEV) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) as a treatment for patients with recurrent malignant gliomas.

METHODS

50 patients with recurrent malignant gliomas treated at our hospital between January 2019 and January 2022 were enrolled and randomized to the control group and combine group using a random table method, with 25 cases in each group. The control group received TMZ and the combine group received BEV plus TMZ. The disease control rate (DCR), the quality-of-life score before and after treatment, and the median 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate as well as adverse reactions were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in DCR between the combine group (80%) and the control group (52%) (χ2 = 5.556, P = .018). In each of the quality-of-life scales, the scores of the combine group were significantly greater than those of the control group after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). In the control group, the median PFS was 16.2 weeks, and the six-month PFS was 19.8%. However, in the combine group, the median PFS was 21.9 weeks, and the six-month PFS was 43.1% (P < .05). Comparing the two groups, the rate of adverse reactions in the control group was significantly higher (44.0% vs 12.0%) (χ2 = 6.349, P = .012).

CONCLUSION

BEV plus TMZ is remarkable in the treatment of patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. The combination treatment improves the DCR and PFS of patients and their quality of life, and does not increase adverse reactions, making it a promising approach that deserves widespread promotion and clinical application.

摘要

目的

探讨贝伐单抗(BEV)联合替莫唑胺(TMZ)治疗复发性恶性胶质瘤患者的临床疗效。

方法

选取2019年1月至2022年1月在我院接受治疗的50例复发性恶性胶质瘤患者,采用随机数字表法将其随机分为对照组和联合组,每组25例。对照组接受TMZ治疗,联合组接受BEV联合TMZ治疗。记录并比较两组的疾病控制率(DCR)、治疗前后的生活质量评分、6个月无进展生存期(PFS)中位数以及不良反应。

结果

联合组(80%)与对照组(52%)的DCR差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 5.556,P = .018)。在各个生活质量量表中,联合组治疗后的得分均显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < .05)。对照组的PFS中位数为16.2周,6个月PFS率为19.8%。而联合组的PFS中位数为21.9周,6个月PFS率为43.1%(P < .05)。两组比较,对照组的不良反应发生率显著更高(44.0% 对12.0%)(χ2 = 6.349,P = .012)。

结论

BEV联合TMZ治疗复发性恶性胶质瘤患者效果显著。联合治疗提高了患者的DCR和PFS以及生活质量,且未增加不良反应,是一种值得广泛推广和临床应用的有前景的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Clinical Efficacy of Bevacizumab Combined with Temozolomide in Treating Gliomas.贝伐单抗联合替莫唑胺治疗胶质瘤的临床疗效
Altern Ther Health Med. 2025 Jul;31(4):284-288.
2
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
3
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.治疗胶质母细胞瘤进展或复发的选择:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;5(1):CD013579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013579.pub2.
4
Procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine for recurrent high-grade glioma.丙卡巴肼、洛莫司汀和长春新碱用于复发性高级别胶质瘤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD011773. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011773.pub2.
5
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.老年新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的治疗:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 23;3(3):CD013261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013261.pub2.
6
Efficacy and safety of combining re-irradiation with bevacizumab compared to bevacizumab alone in the management of recurrent high-grade gliomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review.与单独使用贝伐单抗相比,再程放疗联合贝伐单抗治疗复发性高级别胶质瘤的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Jun 14;18:17562864251343574. doi: 10.1177/17562864251343574. eCollection 2025.
7
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
8
Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis.未治疗的霍奇金淋巴瘤患者化疗和放疗在第二原发性恶性肿瘤、总生存期和无进展生存期方面的优化:个体参与者数据分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD008814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008814.pub2.
9
Using different schedules of Temozolomide to treat low grade gliomas: systematic review of their efficacy and toxicity.使用不同方案的替莫唑胺治疗低级别胶质瘤:对其疗效和毒性的系统评价。
J Neurooncol. 2011 Nov;105(2):135-47. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0657-7. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.