两种有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体的对比研究。

A comparative study of two phakic posterior chamber implantable lenses.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 17;103(20):e38194. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038194.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the postimplantation clinical outcomes of 2 types of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (IOLs): Visian™ implantable collamer lenses (ICL; EVO+ V5; Staar Surgical, Monrovia, CA) and an implantable phakic contact lens (IPCL) (IPCL V2.0, Care Group Sight Solution, India) to correct high myopia and myopic astigmatism. This retrospective study included patients who had undergone phakic IOL implantation performed by a single surgeon between March 2021 and March 2022. Preoperative assessments included slit-lamp examination, fundus examination, spherical equivalent, uncorrected distant visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), specular microscope parameters, and optical quality analysis system parameters. Postoperative assessments after 1 year included slit-lamp examination to detect adverse effects and spherical equivalent, UDVA, CDVA, specular microscope, optical quality analysis system, and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography. Eighty eyes from 42 patients (47 eyes from 24 patients in the ICL group and 33 eyes from 18 patients in the IPCL group) were included. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding preoperative parameters. At 1-year postoperatively, the mean UDVA in the ICL and IPCL groups was 0.019 ± 0.040 logMAR and 0.019 ± 0.041 logMAR, respectively. The mean CDVA was 0.001 ± 0.008 logMAR and 0.001 ± 0.007 logMAR in the ICL and IPCL groups, respectively, showing no statistically significant differences. The postoperative parameters did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The visual acuity and refractive results of both groups were excellent, and both groups exhibited similar efficacy and safety profiles.

摘要

本研究旨在比较两种后房型有晶状体眼人工晶状体(IOL)的植入后临床效果:Visian™可植入Collamer 透镜(ICL;EVO+ V5;Staar Surgical,Monrovia,CA)和可植入有晶状体接触镜(ICPL)(ICPL V2.0,Care Group Sight Solution,印度),以矫正高度近视和近视散光。本回顾性研究纳入了 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月期间由同一位外科医生进行 ICL 植入的患者。术前评估包括裂隙灯检查、眼底检查、等效球镜、未矫正远视力(UDVA)、矫正远视力(CDVA)、共焦显微镜参数和光学生物测量分析系统参数。术后 1 年的评估包括裂隙灯检查以发现不良反应以及等效球镜、UDVA、CDVA、共焦显微镜、光学生物测量分析系统和眼前节光学相干断层扫描。共纳入 42 名患者的 80 只眼(ICL 组 24 名患者的 47 只眼和 IPCL 组 18 名患者的 33 只眼)。两组患者术前参数无统计学差异。术后 1 年,ICL 组和 IPCL 组的平均 UDVA 分别为 0.019±0.040 logMAR 和 0.019±0.041 logMAR,平均 CDVA 分别为 0.001±0.008 logMAR 和 0.001±0.007 logMAR,两组间无统计学差异。两组术后参数无显著差异。两组视力和屈光效果均极佳,且两组均具有相似的疗效和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dc8/11098212/acd40e2ad4b4/medi-103-e38194-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索