Divison of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Department of Cardiology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1409-1421. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 15.
Molecular testing with gene-expression profiling (GEP) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is increasingly used in the surveillance for acute cellular rejection (ACR) after heart transplant. However, the performance of dual testing over each test individually has not been established. Further, the impact of dual noninvasive surveillance on clinical decision-making has not been widely investigated.
We evaluated 2,077 subjects from the Surveillance HeartCare Outcomes Registry registry who were enrolled between 2018 and 2021 and had verified biopsy data and were categorized as dual negative, GEP positive/dd-cfDNA negative, GEP negative/dd-cfDNA positive, or dual positive. The incidence of ACR and follow-up testing rates for each group were evaluated. Positive likelihood ratios (LRs+) were calculated, and biopsy rates over time were analyzed.
The incidence of ACR was 1.5% for dual negative, 1.9% for GEP positive/dd-cfDNA negative, 4.3% for GEP negative/dd-cfDNA positive, and 9.2% for dual-positive groups. Follow-up biopsies were performed after 8.8% for dual negative, 14.2% for GEP positive/dd-cfDNA negative, 22.8% for GEP negative/dd-cfDNA positive, and 35.4% for dual-positive results. The LR+ for ACR was 1.37, 2.91, and 3.90 for GEP positive, dd-cfDNA positive, and dual-positive testing, respectively. From 2018 to 2021, biopsies performed between 2 and 12-months post-transplant declined from 5.9 to 5.3 biopsies/patient, and second-year biopsy rates declined from 1.5 to 0.9 biopsies/patient. At 2 years, survival was 94.9%, and only 2.7% had graft dysfunction.
Dual molecular testing demonstrated improved performance for ACR surveillance compared to single molecular testing. The use of dual noninvasive testing was associated with lower biopsy rates over time, excellent survival, and low incidence of graft dysfunction.
随着基因表达谱(GEP)和供体游离 DNA(dd-cfDNA)的分子检测在心脏移植后急性细胞排斥(ACR)的监测中越来越多地使用,双重检测优于每种单独检测的性能尚未确定。此外,双重非侵入性监测对临床决策的影响尚未得到广泛研究。
我们评估了 2018 年至 2021 年间登记的 Surveillance HeartCare Outcomes 注册中心的 2077 名受试者,这些受试者有经证实的活检数据,并分为双重阴性、GEP 阳性/dd-cfDNA 阴性、GEP 阴性/dd-cfDNA 阳性或双重阳性。评估了每组的 ACR 发生率和随访检测率。计算了阳性似然比(LR+),并分析了随时间推移的活检率。
双重阴性组的 ACR 发生率为 1.5%,GEP 阳性/dd-cfDNA 阴性组为 1.9%,GEP 阴性/dd-cfDNA 阳性组为 4.3%,双重阳性组为 9.2%。在双重阴性组中,8.8%的患者进行了后续活检,在 GEP 阳性/dd-cfDNA 阴性组中为 14.2%,在 GEP 阴性/dd-cfDNA 阳性组中为 22.8%,在双重阳性组中为 35.4%。ACR 的 LR+ 分别为 GEP 阳性、dd-cfDNA 阳性和双重阳性检测的 1.37、2.91 和 3.90。从 2018 年到 2021 年,移植后 2 至 12 个月进行的活检从 5.9 次/患者降至 5.3 次/患者,第二年的活检率从 1.5 次/患者降至 0.9 次/患者。在 2 年时,存活率为 94.9%,仅有 2.7%的患者发生移植物功能障碍。
与单一分子检测相比,双重分子检测在 ACR 监测方面表现出更好的性能。随着时间的推移,使用双重非侵入性检测与较低的活检率相关,具有优异的存活率和较低的移植物功能障碍发生率。