Suppr超能文献

听力损失的听力测试结果与修订后的听力障碍清单中自我报告的听力困难程度之间的一致性因人口统计学因素而异。

Agreement between audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory differs by demographic factors.

机构信息

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Jul 10;78(8):529-535. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222143.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New standardised measures of self-reported hearing difficulty can be validated against audiometric hearing loss. This study reports the influence of demographic factors (age, sex, race and socioeconomic position (SEP)) on the agreement between audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty.

METHODS

Participants were 1558 adults (56.9% female; 20.0% racial minority; mean age 63.7 (SD 14.1) years) from the Medical University of South Carolina Longitudinal Cohort Study of Age-Related Hearing Loss (1988-current). Audiometric hearing loss was defined as the average of pure-tone thresholds at frequencies 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 kHz >25 dB HL in the worse ear. Self-reported hearing difficulty was defined as ≥6 points on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory (RHHI) or RHHI screening version (RHHI-S). We report agreement between audiometric hearing loss and the RHHI(-S), defined by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and observed predicted prevalence. Estimates were stratified to age group, sex, race and SEP proxy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty were 49.0% and 48.8%, respectively. Accuracy was highest among participants aged <60 (77.6%) versus 60-70 (71.4%) and 70+ (71.9%) years, for white (74.6%) versus minority (68.0%) participants and was similar by sex and SEP proxy. Generally, agreement of audiometric hearing loss and RHHI(-S) self-reported hearing difficulty differed by age, sex and race.

CONCLUSIONS

Relationships of audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty vary by demographic factors. These relationships were similar for the full (RHHI) and screening (RHHI-S) versions of this tool.

摘要

背景

新的标准化自报听力困难测量方法可以通过听力损失进行验证。本研究报告了人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、种族和社会经济地位(SEP))对听力损失与自报听力困难之间一致性的影响。

方法

参与者为来自南卡罗来纳医科大学年龄相关性听力损失纵向队列研究(1988 年至今)的 1558 名成年人(女性占 56.9%,少数民族占 20.0%,平均年龄 63.7(14.1)岁)。听力损失定义为较差耳在 0.5、1.0、2.0 和 4.0 kHz 频率的纯音阈值平均值>25 dB HL。自报听力困难定义为修订后的听力障碍清单(RHHI)或 RHHI 筛查版本(RHHI-S)的得分≥6 分。我们报告了听力损失与 RHHI(-S)之间的一致性,以灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和观察到的预测患病率来定义。估计值按年龄组、性别、种族和 SEP 代理进行分层。

结果

听力损失和自报听力困难的患病率分别为 49.0%和 48.8%。<60 岁的参与者(77.6%)比 60-70 岁(71.4%)和 70 岁以上(71.9%)的参与者以及白人(74.6%)比少数民族(68.0%)的参与者的准确性更高,且与性别和 SEP 代理相似。一般来说,听力损失与 RHHI(-S)自报听力困难的一致性因年龄、性别和种族而异。

结论

听力损失与自报听力困难之间的关系因人口统计学因素而异。对于该工具的完整(RHHI)和筛查(RHHI-S)版本,这些关系是相似的。

相似文献

5
Auditory screening in the elderly: comparison between self-report and audiometry.老年人的听力筛查:自我报告与听力测定的比较
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Mar-Apr;71(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)31310-0. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
7
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.改善成人听觉康复中助听器使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 18;2016(8):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub3.
10
Platinum-induced hearing loss after treatment for childhood cancer.儿童癌症治疗后铂诱导的听力损失。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 3;2016(8):CD010181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010181.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults.适用于成人轻至中度听力损失的助听器。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 25;9(9):CD012023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012023.pub2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验