Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Jul 10;78(8):529-535. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222143.
New standardised measures of self-reported hearing difficulty can be validated against audiometric hearing loss. This study reports the influence of demographic factors (age, sex, race and socioeconomic position (SEP)) on the agreement between audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty.
Participants were 1558 adults (56.9% female; 20.0% racial minority; mean age 63.7 (SD 14.1) years) from the Medical University of South Carolina Longitudinal Cohort Study of Age-Related Hearing Loss (1988-current). Audiometric hearing loss was defined as the average of pure-tone thresholds at frequencies 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 kHz >25 dB HL in the worse ear. Self-reported hearing difficulty was defined as ≥6 points on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory (RHHI) or RHHI screening version (RHHI-S). We report agreement between audiometric hearing loss and the RHHI(-S), defined by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and observed predicted prevalence. Estimates were stratified to age group, sex, race and SEP proxy.
The prevalence of audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty were 49.0% and 48.8%, respectively. Accuracy was highest among participants aged <60 (77.6%) versus 60-70 (71.4%) and 70+ (71.9%) years, for white (74.6%) versus minority (68.0%) participants and was similar by sex and SEP proxy. Generally, agreement of audiometric hearing loss and RHHI(-S) self-reported hearing difficulty differed by age, sex and race.
Relationships of audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty vary by demographic factors. These relationships were similar for the full (RHHI) and screening (RHHI-S) versions of this tool.
新的标准化自报听力困难测量方法可以通过听力损失进行验证。本研究报告了人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、种族和社会经济地位(SEP))对听力损失与自报听力困难之间一致性的影响。
参与者为来自南卡罗来纳医科大学年龄相关性听力损失纵向队列研究(1988 年至今)的 1558 名成年人(女性占 56.9%,少数民族占 20.0%,平均年龄 63.7(14.1)岁)。听力损失定义为较差耳在 0.5、1.0、2.0 和 4.0 kHz 频率的纯音阈值平均值>25 dB HL。自报听力困难定义为修订后的听力障碍清单(RHHI)或 RHHI 筛查版本(RHHI-S)的得分≥6 分。我们报告了听力损失与 RHHI(-S)之间的一致性,以灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和观察到的预测患病率来定义。估计值按年龄组、性别、种族和 SEP 代理进行分层。
听力损失和自报听力困难的患病率分别为 49.0%和 48.8%。<60 岁的参与者(77.6%)比 60-70 岁(71.4%)和 70 岁以上(71.9%)的参与者以及白人(74.6%)比少数民族(68.0%)的参与者的准确性更高,且与性别和 SEP 代理相似。一般来说,听力损失与 RHHI(-S)自报听力困难的一致性因年龄、性别和种族而异。
听力损失与自报听力困难之间的关系因人口统计学因素而异。对于该工具的完整(RHHI)和筛查(RHHI-S)版本,这些关系是相似的。