• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不符合 POINT/CHANCE 试验治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者中阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗的趋势及结局。

Trends in Dual Antiplatelet Therapy of Aspirin and Clopidogrel and Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients Noneligible for POINT/CHANCE Trial Treatment.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Hospital Chonnam National University Medical School Gwangju Korea.

Clinical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e033611. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033611. Epub 2024 May 18.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.123.033611
PMID:38761083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11179811/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical trials established the benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (DAPT-AC) in early-presenting patients with minor ischemic stroke. However, the impact of these trials over time on the use and outcomes of DAPT-AC among the patients with nonminor or late-presenting stroke who do not meet the eligibility criteria of these trials has not been delineated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a multicenter stroke registry, this study examined yearly changes from April 2008 to August 2022 in DAPT-AC use for stroke patients ineligible for CHANCE/POINT (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events/Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke) clinical trials due to National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale >4 or late arrival beyond 24 hours of onset. A total of 32 118 patients (age, 68.1±13.1 years; male, 58.5%) with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 4 (interquartile range, 1-7) were analyzed. In 2008, DAPT-AC was used in 33.0%, other antiplatelets in 62.7%, and no antiplatelet in 4.3%. The frequency of DAPT-AC was relatively unchanged through 2013, when the CHANCE trial was published, and then increased steadily, reaching 78% in 2022, while other antiplatelets decreased to 17.8% in 2022 (<0.001). From 2011 to 2022, clinical outcomes nonsignificantly improved, with an average relative risk reduction of 2%/y for the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality, both among patients treated with DAPT-AC and patients treated with other antiplatelets.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of DAPT-AC in stroke patients with stroke ineligible for recent DAPT clinical trials increased markedly and steadily after CHANCE publication in 2013, reaching deployment in nearly 4 of every 5 patients by 2022. The secondary prevention in patients with ischemic stroke seems to be gradually improving, possibly due to the enhancement of risk factor control.

摘要

背景

最近的临床试验证实,在早期出现的轻度缺血性卒中患者中,使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT-AC)有益。然而,这些试验随着时间的推移对不符合这些试验入选标准的非小或迟发性卒中患者的 DAPT-AC 使用及其结局的影响尚未明确。

方法和结果

在一项多中心卒中登记研究中,本研究考察了 2008 年 4 月至 2022 年 8 月期间,由于国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)>4 分或发病后 24 小时以上延迟就诊,不符合 CHANCE/POINT(高风险急性非致残性脑血管事件患者中的氯吡格雷/新 TIA 和小卒中的血小板导向抑制)临床试验入选标准的卒中患者中,DAPT-AC 的使用变化情况。共分析了 32118 例 NIHSS 为 4 分(四分位数间距 1-7)的患者(年龄 68.1±13.1 岁;男性 58.5%)。2008 年,DAPT-AC 的使用率为 33.0%,其他抗血小板药物为 62.7%,无抗血小板药物为 4.3%。2013 年 CHANCE 试验发表后,DAPT-AC 的使用率相对保持不变,随后稳步上升,2022 年达到 78%,而其他抗血小板药物则降至 2022 年的 17.8%(<0.001)。2011 年至 2022 年,临床结局无显著改善,DAPT-AC 治疗和其他抗血小板药物治疗的患者的复合终点(卒中、心肌梗死和全因死亡率)的平均相对风险降低率为 2%/年。

结论

在 2013 年 CHANCE 试验发表后,不符合最近 DAPT 临床试验入选标准的卒中患者中 DAPT-AC 的使用明显且稳步增加,到 2022 年,近 4 例患者中就有 3 例使用了 DAPT-AC。缺血性卒中患者的二级预防似乎在逐渐改善,可能是由于危险因素控制的增强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ac3/11179811/1c7062ebd96c/JAH3-13-e033611-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ac3/11179811/6127d440e134/JAH3-13-e033611-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ac3/11179811/8f2f98bb53ca/JAH3-13-e033611-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ac3/11179811/1c7062ebd96c/JAH3-13-e033611-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ac3/11179811/6127d440e134/JAH3-13-e033611-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ac3/11179811/8f2f98bb53ca/JAH3-13-e033611-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ac3/11179811/1c7062ebd96c/JAH3-13-e033611-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in Dual Antiplatelet Therapy of Aspirin and Clopidogrel and Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients Noneligible for POINT/CHANCE Trial Treatment.不符合 POINT/CHANCE 试验治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者中阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗的趋势及结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e033611. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033611. Epub 2024 May 18.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Aspirin and Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Mild-to-Moderate Acute Ischemic Stroke According to the Risk of Recurrent Stroke: An Analysis of 15 000 Patients From a Nationwide, Multicenter Registry.根据复发性中风风险比较阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗在轻度至中度急性缺血性中风中的有效性:对来自全国多中心登记处的15000名患者的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006474. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006474. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
3
Outcomes Associated With Clopidogrel-Aspirin Use in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Pooled Analysis of Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Non-Disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) and Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trials.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林用于轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作的疗效:氯吡格雷用于急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者(CHANCE)及新发性短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度缺血性卒中血小板靶向抑制(POINT)试验的汇总分析
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1466-1473. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2531.
4
Analysis of Prescriptions for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中后双联抗血小板治疗处方分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2224157. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24157.
5
Treatment Strategies and Prognosis for Moderate Stroke Patients in China.中国中度中风患者的治疗策略与预后
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024;53(5):547-555. doi: 10.1159/000535171. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
6
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Using Cilostazol With Aspirin or Clopidogrel: Subanalysis of the CSPS.com Trial.西洛他唑联合阿司匹林或氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗:CSPS.com 试验的亚组分析。
Stroke. 2021 Nov;52(11):3430-3439. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034378. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Aspirin and Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute, Nonminor Stroke: A Nationwide, Multicenter Registry-Based Study.双联抗血小板治疗(阿司匹林+氯吡格雷)与阿司匹林单药治疗急性非小卒中的疗效比较:一项全国多中心基于注册登记的研究。
Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3147-3155. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026044. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
8
Efficacy and safety of aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone in ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷与阿司匹林单药治疗缺血性卒中和高危短暂性脑缺血发作的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Vasc Med. 2024 Oct;29(5):517-525. doi: 10.1177/1358863X241265335. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
9
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.双联抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗轻度非致残性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的随机临床试验(ARAMIS)
JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2135-2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
10
Evaluation of Systolic Blood Pressure, Use of Aspirin and Clopidogrel, and Stroke Recurrence in the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke Trial.血小板靶向抑制治疗新 TIA 和小卒中试验中收缩压评估、阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的使用与卒中复发
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112551. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12551.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Prescriptions for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中后双联抗血小板治疗处方分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2224157. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24157.
2
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Loss-of-Function Carriers with Stroke or TIA.替卡格雷与氯吡格雷在伴有卒中和 TIA 的功能丧失型携带者中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 30;385(27):2520-2530. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111749. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
3
European Stroke Organisation expedited recommendation for the use of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy early after minor stroke and high-risk TIA.
欧洲卒中组织关于在轻度卒中及高危短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)后早期使用短期双重抗血小板治疗的快速推荐意见。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Jun;6(2):CLXXXVII-CXCI. doi: 10.1177/23969873211000877. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
4
2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.《2021年卒中与短暂性脑缺血发作患者卒中预防指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会指南》
Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):e364-e467. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000375. Epub 2021 May 24.
5
Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Aspirin and Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Mild-to-Moderate Acute Ischemic Stroke According to the Risk of Recurrent Stroke: An Analysis of 15 000 Patients From a Nationwide, Multicenter Registry.根据复发性中风风险比较阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗在轻度至中度急性缺血性中风中的有效性:对来自全国多中心登记处的15000名患者的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006474. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006474. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Aspirin and Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute, Nonminor Stroke: A Nationwide, Multicenter Registry-Based Study.双联抗血小板治疗(阿司匹林+氯吡格雷)与阿司匹林单药治疗急性非小卒中的疗效比较:一项全国多中心基于注册登记的研究。
Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3147-3155. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026044. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
7
Outcomes Associated With Clopidogrel-Aspirin Use in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Pooled Analysis of Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Non-Disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) and Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trials.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林用于轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作的疗效:氯吡格雷用于急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者(CHANCE)及新发性短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度缺血性卒中血小板靶向抑制(POINT)试验的汇总分析
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1466-1473. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2531.
8
Clopidogrel and aspirin after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.氯吡格雷和阿司匹林治疗缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作:更新的随机临床试验系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Feb;47(2):233-247. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1786-z.
9
Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke and High-Risk TIA.氯吡格雷和阿司匹林在急性缺血性卒中和高风险 TIA 中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):215-225. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800410. Epub 2018 May 16.
10
Antiplatelet Regimen for Patients With Breakthrough Strokes While on Aspirin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗血小板治疗方案对阿司匹林治疗期间发生突破性卒中的患者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2610-2613. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017895. Epub 2017 Jul 12.