• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在澳大利亚,何时医疗从业者不符合“适合且行为端正”的行医要求?

When is a Health Practitioner Not "a Fit and Proper Person" to Practise Their Health Profession in Australia?

机构信息

Adjunct Professor at La Trobe University School of Law.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2024 May;31(1):88-104.

PMID:38761391
Abstract

Prior to implementation of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 (Qld) (National Law) the term "good character" was used in the statutory regulation of health practitioners in Australia. "Good character" has been jettisoned in the National Law and replaced with the concept of "fit and proper person". The term "fit and proper person" plays an important role in the regulation of health practitioners under the National Law. "Fit and proper person" is not defined in the National Law but case law has narrowed the term to refer to "moral integrity" and "rectitude of character". These considerations can be applied in the context of application for registration, immediate action, and disciplinary proceedings in relevant tribunals. Application of the "fit and proper person" test serves to enhance public confidence in the integrity of the health professions and the integrity of the regulatory regime, as distinct from protecting the public from unsafe and incompetent health professionals.

摘要

在 2009 年《(昆士兰州)健康从业者监管全国法》(全国法)实施之前,“良好品行”一词曾在澳大利亚对健康从业者的法定监管中使用。在全国法中,“良好品行”已被摒弃,取而代之的是“适合和适当的人”的概念。“适合和适当的人”这一术语在全国法下对健康从业者的监管中发挥着重要作用。“适合和适当的人”一词在全国法中并未定义,但判例法已将该术语缩小为指“道德操守”和“正直品格”。这些考虑因素可适用于注册申请、即时行动和相关法庭纪律程序的情况。“适合和适当的人”测试的应用有助于增强公众对健康行业诚信和监管制度诚信的信心,而不是保护公众免受不安全和不称职的健康从业者的伤害。

相似文献

1
When is a Health Practitioner Not "a Fit and Proper Person" to Practise Their Health Profession in Australia?在澳大利亚,何时医疗从业者不符合“适合且行为端正”的行医要求?
J Law Med. 2024 May;31(1):88-104.
2
Serious misconduct of health professionals in disciplinary tribunals under the National Law 2010-17.国家法律 2010-17 下纪律审裁处中医疗专业人员的严重不当行为。
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Apr;44(2):190-199. doi: 10.1071/AH18239.
3
"Good character" and the regulation of medical practitioners.“良好品德”与执业医师管理
J Law Med. 2008 Dec;16(3):488-511.
4
Investigating Investigation Powers under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law.依据《健康从业者监管国家法》调查调查权力
J Law Med. 2023 Dec;30(3):673-689.
5
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.
6
Notifications and mandatory reporting--two years on.通知与强制报告——两年之后
J Law Med. 2012 Dec;20(2):273-9.
7
Unconventional Practice, "Innovative" Interventions and the National Law.非常规做法、“创新”干预措施与国家法律。
J Law Med. 2020 Apr;27(3):574-589.
8
Determining the risk of recidivism in previously de-registered health practitioners.确定曾被注销注册的医疗从业者的再犯风险。
J Law Med. 2013 Sep;21(1):67-81.
9
Regulation of healthcare and medical imaging in Australia: A narrative review of the evolution, function and impact on professional behaviours.澳大利亚的医疗保健和医学影像监管:对演变、功能及其对专业行为的影响的叙述性综述。
Radiography (Lond). 2021 Aug;27(3):935-942. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
10
The Public Interest Test in Immediate Action Hearings under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law.《全国卫生从业者监管法规下即时行动听证的公共利益测试》。
J Law Med. 2021 Dec;28(4):976-992.