Marco J, Baradat G, Constans R, Alibelli M J, Berthoumieu H, Dardenne P
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1979 Apr;72(4):376-84.
Repeated continuous ambulatory electrocardiography by Holter monitoring was performed after early mobilisation post-myocardial infarction in 100 patients, without ventricular extrasystoles on classical ECG. Frequent ventricular arrhythmias were recorded in 58 p. 100 cases, unrelated to the localisation of the infarct. The observation of ventricular arrhythmias in the Coronary Care Unit (CCU) was not related to the occurrence of VEs during Holter monitoring. On the other hand, VEs were less frequent (38 p. 100 compared to 68 p. 100) in patients taking amiodarone or betablockers on transfer from the CCU. The reduced activity of patients during Holter monitoring minimises the frequency of arrhythmias, and 10 p. 100 patients were observed to have VEs only after exercise tolerance testing. These VEs seem to be a bad prognostic factor; the 9 patients who died in this series all presented VEs on ambulatory monitoring (7) or during exercise tolerance testing (2). However the number of patients with triple vessel disease was greater in the group with VEs on ambulatory monitoring (57 p. 100 compared with 13 p. 100). It is difficult to assess the precise role of the VEs amongst the other risk factors of sudden death. This is not a randomised study, but it would appear that long=term amiodarone or betablockers therapy may influence the medium-term prognosis.
对100例心肌梗死后早期活动且常规心电图无室性期前收缩的患者进行了动态心电图监测下的重复连续动态心电图检查。在100例患者中有58例记录到频发室性心律失常,与梗死部位无关。冠心病监护病房(CCU)对室性心律失常的观察与动态心电图监测期间室性期前收缩的发生无关。另一方面,从CCU转出时服用胺碘酮或β受体阻滞剂的患者室性期前收缩较少(100例中有38例,而未服用者为100例中有68例)。动态心电图监测期间患者活动减少使心律失常频率降至最低,100例患者中有10例仅在运动耐量试验后出现室性期前收缩。这些室性期前收缩似乎是不良预后因素;该系列中死亡的9例患者在动态监测(7例)或运动耐量试验(2例)时均出现室性期前收缩。然而,动态监测有室性期前收缩的组中三支血管病变患者数量更多(100例中有57例,而无室性期前收缩组为100例中有13例)。很难评估室性期前收缩在其他猝死危险因素中的精确作用。这不是一项随机研究,但长期胺碘酮或β受体阻滞剂治疗似乎可能影响中期预后。