Suppr超能文献

在社区中预期生命末期时给予注射药物:一项混合方法观察性研究。

Administering injectable medications prescribed in the anticipation of the end of life in the community: A mixed-methods observational study.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Queen's Nursing Institute, London, United Kingdom; Nottingham Centre for the Advancement of Research into Supportive, Palliative and End-of-Life Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Nottingham Centre for the Advancement of Research into Supportive, Palliative and End-of-Life Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104734. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prescription of injectable anticipatory medications ahead of possible need for last-days-of-life symptom relief is established community practice internationally. Healthcare teams and policy makers view anticipatory medication as having a key role in optimising effective and timely symptom control. However, how these medications are subsequently administered (used) is unclear and warrants detailed investigation to inform interdisciplinary practice and guidance.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the frequency, timing and recorded circumstances of the administration of injectable end-of-life anticipatory medications prescribed for patients living at home and in residential care.

DESIGN

A retrospective mixed-methods observational study using general practitioner (family doctor) and community nursing held clinical records.

SETTING(S): Community-based care in two English counties.

PARTICIPANTS

167 deceased adult patients (aged 18+) registered with eleven general practitioner practices and two associated community nursing services. These were patients prescribed anticipatory medications, identified from the 30 most recent deaths per practice. Patients died between 1 March 2017 and 25 September 2019, from any cause except trauma, sudden death or suicide.

METHODS

Patient characteristics, anticipatory medication discussions, recorded administration contexts and decision-making, medication details, recorded symptom control and comfort at death were collected from clinical records. Data analysis combined quantitative and qualitative analyses in a mixed methods approach.

RESULTS

Anticipatory medications were administered to 59.9 % (100/167) patients, commenced between 0 and 586 days before death (median 3 days). Their usage was similar for patients who died from cancer and non-cancer conditions. Anticipatory medications were almost universally started and titrated by visiting nurses. Eleven patients had medications started between 59 days and 586 days before death for recorded reversible non-end-of-life care conditions. Only 5 % (5/100) of patient records contained detailed accounts of patient participation in decisions to start medications: four were recorded as being reluctant to commence medications but agreed to trial injections to relieve symptoms. Crucially, there was recurrent under-recording of the effectiveness of injectable medications and patient comfort.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribed medications were commonly administered by visiting community nurses to help manage last-days-of-life symptoms. However, patient records infrequently referred to the effectiveness of administered medication and perceived patient comfort. Most recorded references to patient and family preferences for involvement in anticipatory medication decision-making and their experiences of care were brief and perfunctory. More detailed information should be routinely recorded in clinical records to enable assessment of the appropriate and effective use of anticipatory medicines and how inter-professional collaboration and services could be developed to provide adequate twenty-four-hour cover.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Effectiveness of injectable end-of-life symptom control medications and patient comfort often under-recorded @Ben_Bowers__ @PELi_Cam @TheQNI.

摘要

背景

在可能需要临终症状缓解之前,提前开具注射用预期药物的处方是国际上已确立的社区实践。医疗保健团队和政策制定者认为,预期药物在优化有效和及时的症状控制方面发挥着关键作用。然而,这些药物随后如何使用(使用)尚不清楚,需要进行详细调查,以为跨学科实践和指导提供信息。

目的

确定为在家中或居住护理机构中生活的患者开具的注射用临终预期药物的使用频率、时间和记录情况。

设计

使用全科医生(家庭医生)和社区护理持有的临床记录进行回顾性混合方法观察性研究。

地点

两个英格兰郡的基于社区的护理。

参与者

167 名已去世的成年患者(年龄在 18 岁及以上),在 11 家全科医生诊所和 2 家相关社区护理服务中登记。这些患者是从每家诊所最近的 30 例死亡中确定的,他们开了预期药物。患者于 2017 年 3 月 1 日至 2019 年 9 月 25 日期间死亡,除创伤、猝死或自杀外,死因各不相同。

方法

从临床记录中收集患者特征、预期药物讨论、记录的管理背景和决策、药物详细信息、死亡时的症状控制和舒适度记录。数据分析采用混合方法,结合定量和定性分析。

结果

59.9%(100/167)的患者接受了预期药物治疗,开始使用时间在死亡前 0 至 586 天之间(中位数为 3 天)。癌症和非癌症患者的使用情况相似。预期药物几乎都是由上门护士开始和调整剂量的。11 名患者在记录可逆的非临终护理条件下,在死亡前 59 天至 586 天之间开始使用药物。只有 5%(5/100)的患者记录详细说明了患者参与开始药物治疗的决策:有 4 名患者表示不愿意开始使用药物,但同意试用注射以缓解症状。至关重要的是,经常记录下注射药物的有效性和患者舒适度。

结论

开处方的药物通常由上门社区护士管理,以帮助控制临终症状。然而,患者记录很少提及管理药物的有效性和患者的舒适度。大多数记录的患者和家属对参与预期药物决策的偏好及其对护理的体验的参考都是简短而敷衍的。应在临床记录中常规记录更详细的信息,以便评估预期药物的合理有效使用情况,以及如何发展跨专业合作和服务,以提供充足的 24 小时覆盖。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验