• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同时令人安心和不安:一项针对老年患者社区预期用药处方的纵向定性研究。

Simultaneously reassuring and unsettling: a longitudinal qualitative study of community anticipatory medication prescribing for older patients.

机构信息

Palliative & End of Life Care Group in Cambridge (PELiCAM), Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.

Nottingham Centre for the Advancement of Research into Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2022 Dec 5;51(12). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac293.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afac293
PMID:36477784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9729004/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prescription of injectable anticipatory medications is widely accepted by clinicians to be key in facilitating effective last-days-of-life symptom control. Community end-of-life care and admission avoidance is particularly strongly advocated for older patients. However, patient and informal caregiver views and experiences of anticipatory medication have been little studied to date.

OBJECTIVE

To understand older patients', informal caregivers' and clinicians' views and experiences of the prescribing and use of anticipatory medications.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING

Patients' homes and residential care homes.

PARTICIPANTS

Purposive sample of six older patients, nine informal caregivers and six clinicians.

METHODS

Multi-perspective, longitudinal interview study based on 11 patient cases. Semi-structured interviews (n = 28) were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified: (i) living in the present whilst making plans: anticipatory medications were used by clinicians as a practical tool in planning for uncertainty, while patients and informal caregivers tried to concentrate on living in the present; (ii) anticipation of dying: it was rare for patients and informal caregivers to discuss explicitly the process and experience of dying with clinicians; and (iii) accessing timely care: the use of anticipatory medications generally helped symptom control. However, informal caregivers reported difficulties in persuading nurses to administer them to patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticipatory medications are simultaneously reassuring and a source of unease to older patients and their informal caregivers. Prescriptions need careful discussion and tailoring to their preferences and experience. Nurses' decisions to administer medication should consider informal caregivers' insights into patient distress, especially when patients can no longer communicate their needs.

摘要

背景

注射用预期待遇药物的处方被临床医生广泛接受,是促进有效临终症状控制的关键。社区临终关怀和避免入院尤其强烈地提倡用于老年患者。然而,迄今为止,患者和非正式照顾者对预期待遇药物的看法和经验很少被研究。

目的

了解老年患者、非正式照顾者和临床医生对预期待遇药物的处方和使用的看法和经验。

设计

定性研究。

设置

患者的家和养老院。

参与者

有目的抽取的 6 名老年患者、9 名非正式照顾者和 6 名临床医生。

方法

基于 11 个病例的多视角、纵向访谈研究。对 28 次半结构化访谈进行了主题分析。

结果

确定了三个主题:(i)活在当下的同时做计划:临床医生将预期待遇药物用作规划不确定性的实用工具,而患者和非正式照顾者则试图专注于活在当下;(ii)对死亡的预期:患者和非正式照顾者很少与临床医生明确讨论死亡的过程和经历;(iii)及时获得护理:使用预期待遇药物通常有助于控制症状。然而,非正式照顾者报告说,他们很难说服护士给患者使用这些药物。

结论

预期待遇药物同时让老年患者及其非正式照顾者感到安心和不安。处方需要仔细讨论,并根据他们的偏好和经验进行调整。护士给药的决定应考虑非正式照顾者对患者痛苦的见解,尤其是当患者无法再表达自己的需求时。

相似文献

1
Simultaneously reassuring and unsettling: a longitudinal qualitative study of community anticipatory medication prescribing for older patients.同时令人安心和不安:一项针对老年患者社区预期用药处方的纵向定性研究。
Age Ageing. 2022 Dec 5;51(12). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac293.
2
A qualitative study of community nurses' decision-making around the anticipatory prescribing of end-of-life medications.一项关于社区护士在临终前药物预开处方方面决策的定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Oct;73(10):2385-2394. doi: 10.1111/jan.13319. Epub 2017 May 16.
3
GPs' decisions about prescribing end-of-life anticipatory medications: a qualitative study.全科医生对临终前预开医嘱的决策:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Oct 1;70(699):e731-e739. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712625. Print 2020 Oct.
4
Administering injectable medications prescribed in the anticipation of the end of life in the community: A mixed-methods observational study.在社区中预期生命末期时给予注射药物:一项混合方法观察性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104734. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
5
Administering anticipatory medications in end-of-life care: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the community and in nursing homes.临终关怀中给予预防性药物:一项关于社区和养老院护理实践的定性研究
Palliat Med. 2015 Jan;29(1):60-70. doi: 10.1177/0269216314543042. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
6
Older peoples' and informal caregivers' experiences, views, and needs in transitional care decision-making: a systematic review.老年人和非正式照顾者在过渡性护理决策中的经验、观点和需求:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Oct;134:104303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104303. Epub 2022 May 31.
7
Transitional care decision-making through the eyes of older people and informal caregivers: An in-depth interview-based study.从老年人和非正式照护者的角度看过渡性护理决策:一项基于深入访谈的研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1266-1275. doi: 10.1111/hex.13743. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
8
Anticipatory grief and experience of providing at-home palliative care among informal caregivers of spouses in Croatia: a qualitative study.克罗地亚配偶非专业照护者的预期悲伤和提供家庭姑息治疗的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Nov 18;21(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01093-1.
9
Unwelcome memento mori or best clinical practice? Community end of life anticipatory medication prescribing practice: A mixed methods observational study.不受欢迎的死亡提醒还是最佳临床实践?社区临终预期用药处方实践:一项混合方法观察性研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;36(1):95-104. doi: 10.1177/02692163211043382. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
10
Anticipatory prescribing in community end-of-life care: systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence since 2017.社区临终关怀中的预期性处方:2017 年以来证据的系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 8;13(e3):e612-e623. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004080.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple points of system failure underpin continuous subcutaneous infusion safety incidents in palliative care: A mixed methods analysis.多系统故障是姑息治疗中持续皮下输注安全事件的基础:一项混合方法分析。
Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;39(1):7-21. doi: 10.1177/02692163241287639. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Anticipatory prescribing of injectable controlled drugs (ICDs) in care homes: a qualitative observational study of staff role, uncertain dying and hospital transfer at the end-of-life.在养老院中对注射类管制药物(ICDs)进行预期性处方:一项关于临终关怀时员工角色、不确定死亡和医院转介的定性观察研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 3;24(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04801-z.
3
The financial costs of anticipatory prescribing: A retrospective observational study of prescribed, administered and wasted medications using community clinical records.预期处方的财务成本:使用社区临床记录的预定、管理和浪费药物的回顾性观察研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1554-1561. doi: 10.1177/02692163231198372. Epub 2023 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Community-based anticipatory prescribing during COVID-19: a qualitative study.新冠疫情期间基于社区的预立处方:一项定性研究
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2977-e2985. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003597.
2
Unwelcome memento mori or best clinical practice? Community end of life anticipatory medication prescribing practice: A mixed methods observational study.不受欢迎的死亡提醒还是最佳临床实践?社区临终预期用药处方实践:一项混合方法观察性研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;36(1):95-104. doi: 10.1177/02692163211043382. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
3
The 'work' of managing medications when someone is seriously ill and dying at home: A longitudinal qualitative case study of patient and family perspectives'.当患者病重且在家中临终时,管理药物治疗的“工作”:一项从患者和家属角度出发的纵向定性案例研究。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):1941-1950. doi: 10.1177/02692163211030113. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
4
Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings of a UK primary care survey.新冠疫情期间的社区临终关怀:一项英国初级医疗调查的结果
BJGP Open. 2021 Aug 24;5(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0095. Print 2021 Aug.
5
Mapping end-of-life and anticipatory medications in palliative care patients using a longitudinal general practice database.利用纵向全科医疗数据库对姑息治疗患者的临终及预支药物进行映射分析。
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Feb;20(1):94-100. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521000092.
6
Are family carers part of the care team providing end-of-life care? A qualitative interview study on the collaboration between family and professional carers.家庭护理员是否是提供临终关怀的护理团队的一部分?一项关于家庭护理员和专业护理员之间合作的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;35(1):109-119. doi: 10.1177/0269216320954342. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
GPs' decisions about prescribing end-of-life anticipatory medications: a qualitative study.全科医生对临终前预开医嘱的决策:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Oct 1;70(699):e731-e739. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712625. Print 2020 Oct.
8
Anticipatory prescribing in community end-of-life care in the UK and Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey.英国和爱尔兰在 COVID-19 大流行期间社区临终关怀中的预期处方:在线调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Sep;10(3):343-349. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002394. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
9
Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT.居家临终患者按需皮下注射治疗突破性症状的照护者管理:CARiAD 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(25):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta24250.
10
'It all depends!': A qualitative study of preferences for place of care and place of death in terminally ill patients and their family caregivers.“这完全取决于!”:一项关于终末期患者及其家属对护理地点和死亡地点偏好的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2019 Jul;33(7):802-811. doi: 10.1177/0269216319845794. Epub 2019 May 3.