Suppr超能文献

如何让院前急救人员应对伦理挑战:信心、信任和安全的重要性。

How prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges: the importance of confidence, trust, and safety.

机构信息

The Prehospital Research Unit, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart (RFM), University of Southern Denmark & Psychiatric dept, Middelfart, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 18;25(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01061-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ethical challenges constitute an inseparable part of daily decision-making processes in all areas of healthcare. Ethical challenges are associated with moral distress that can lead to burnout. Clinical ethics support has proven useful to address and manage such challenges. This paper explores how prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges. The study is part of a larger action research project to develop and test an approach to clinical ethics support that is sensitive to the context of emergency medicine.

METHODS

We explored ethical challenges and management strategies in three focus groups, with 15 participants in total, each attended by emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and prehospital anaesthesiologists. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The approach to data analysis was systematic text condensation approach.

RESULTS

We stratified the management of ethical challenges into actions before, during, and after incidents. Before incidents, participants stressed the importance of mutual understandings, shared worldviews, and a supportive approach to managing emotions. During an incident, the participants employed moral perception, moral judgments, and moral actions. After an incident, the participants described sharing ethical challenges only to a limited extent as sharing was emotionally challenging, and not actively supported by workplace culture, or organisational procedures. The participants primarily managed ethical challenges informally, often using humour to cope.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis supports and clarifies that confidence, trust, and safety in relation to colleagues, management, and the wider organisation are essential for prehospital emergency personnel to share ethical challenges and preventing moral distress turning into burnout.

摘要

背景

伦理挑战是医疗保健各个领域日常决策过程中不可分割的一部分。伦理挑战与道德困境相关,可能导致职业倦怠。临床伦理支持已被证明有助于解决和管理此类挑战。本文探讨了院前急救人员如何应对伦理挑战。该研究是一个更大的行动研究项目的一部分,旨在开发和测试一种对急诊医学背景敏感的临床伦理支持方法。

方法

我们在三个焦点小组中探讨了伦理挑战和管理策略,共有 15 名参与者,包括急诊医疗技术员、护理人员和院前麻醉师。焦点小组进行了录音和逐字转录。数据分析的方法是系统文本浓缩方法。

结果

我们将伦理挑战的管理分为事件发生前、事件发生中和事件发生后三个阶段。在事件发生前,参与者强调了相互理解、共同的世界观和支持情绪管理的方法的重要性。在事件发生期间,参与者运用了道德感知、道德判断和道德行动。在事件发生后,参与者仅在有限的程度上描述了分享伦理挑战,因为分享会带来情绪上的挑战,并且没有得到工作场所文化或组织程序的积极支持。参与者主要以非正式的方式管理伦理挑战,经常使用幽默来应对。

结论

我们的分析支持并阐明,对于院前急救人员来说,与同事、管理层和更广泛的组织建立信心、信任和安全关系对于分享伦理挑战和防止道德困境转化为职业倦怠至关重要。

相似文献

2
Ethical challenges experienced by prehospital emergency personnel: a practice-based model of analysis.
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Aug 12;23(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00821-9.
3
Ethical conflicts in prehospital emergency care.
Nurs Ethics. 2006 Nov;13(6):592-607. doi: 10.1177/0969733006069694.
4
Barriers to ethical decision-making for pre-hospital care professionals.
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Mar;27(2):407-418. doi: 10.1177/0969733019848044. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
5
Prehospital Providers' Perspectives about Online Medical Direction in Emergency End-of-Life Decision-Making.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 Mar-Apr;26(2):223-232. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1863532. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Ethical decision-making based on field assessment: The experiences of prehospital personnel.
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Jun;26(4):1075-1086. doi: 10.1177/0969733017736925. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
9
Paramedic and physician perspectives on the potential use of remotely supported prehospital ultrasound.
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Sep;18(3):4574. doi: 10.22605/RRH4574. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
10
Prioritising patient care: The different views of clinicians and managers.
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Sep;25(6):746-759. doi: 10.1177/0969733016664977. Epub 2017 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes.
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Sep 27;23(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00832-6.
7
Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical ethics committees: a systematic review.
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Mar;24(1):135-151. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09986-9. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
8
The Danish prehospital system.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(6):394-395. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000774.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验