Suppr超能文献

如何在使用多功能作品集时运用极性思维来管理问责制和学习者主体之间的紧张关系?

How to use polarity thinking to manage tensions between accountability and learner agency when using a multipurpose portfolio?

机构信息

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Department of Pathology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Educ Prim Care. 2024 May-Jul;35(3-4):71-80. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2024.2335610. Epub 2024 May 19.

Abstract

Portfolios are often implemented to target multiple purposes, e.g. assessment, accountability and/or self-regulated learning. However, in educational practice, it appears to be difficult to combine different purposes in one portfolio, as interdependencies between the purposes can cause tensions. This paper explored directions to manage tensions that are inextricably linked to multipurpose portfolio use. We used a systems thinking methodology, that was based on the polarity thinking framework. This framework provides a step-by-step approach to chart a polarity map® that can help to balance the tensions present in specific settings. We followed the steps of the framework to chart a polarity map for multipurpose portfolio use. Based on literature and our prior research, we selected one overarching polarity: accountability and learner agency. This polarity seems responsible for multiple tensions related to multipurpose portfolio use. We formulated values (potential benefits) and fears (tensions that can arise) of the two poles of this polarity. Then, we organised a session with stakeholders who work with the portfolio of the Dutch General Practice speciality programme. Together we formulated action steps and early warnings that can help to balance accountability and learner agency during multipurpose portfolio use. In addition to previous recommendations concerning portfolio use, we advocate that it is important to create a shared frame of reference between all involved with the multipurpose portfolio. During this process, the acknowledgement and discussion of tensions related to multipurpose portfolio use are vital.

摘要

组合通常用于实现多个目的,例如评估、问责制和/或自我调节学习。然而,在教育实践中,似乎很难将不同的目的结合在一个组合中,因为目的之间的相互依存关系会导致紧张局势。本文探讨了管理多用途组合使用中不可避免的紧张关系的方向。我们使用了系统思维方法,该方法基于极性思维框架。该框架提供了一种逐步绘制极性图®的方法,可以帮助平衡特定环境中存在的紧张关系。我们按照框架的步骤绘制了多用途组合使用的极性图。基于文献和我们之前的研究,我们选择了一个总体极性:问责制和学习者的能动性。这个极性似乎与多用途组合使用相关的多个紧张关系有关。我们制定了这个极性两个极点的价值观(潜在利益)和恐惧(可能出现的紧张关系)。然后,我们与参与荷兰普通实践专业计划组合的利益相关者组织了一次会议。我们共同制定了有助于平衡多用途组合使用过程中问责制和学习者能动性的行动步骤和预警。除了之前关于组合使用的建议外,我们还主张在涉及多用途组合的所有人之间建立一个共同的参考框架非常重要。在这个过程中,承认和讨论与多用途组合使用相关的紧张关系至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验