Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Department of Cariology, Endodontology, and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Caries Res. 2024;58(5):502-510. doi: 10.1159/000539406. Epub 2024 May 22.
Visual imaging of subsurface caries lesions is of vital interest in dentistry, which can be obtained by invasive radiography technique as well as by available non-destructive imaging approaches. Thus, as a first step toward the development of a new innovative approach, Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was applied to detect the lesion depth in comparison to the established reference technique (transverse microradiography [TMR]).
Bovine enamel specimens were demineralized for 5 days, following previous studies. For OCT, the resulting artificial lesions were scanned three-dimensionally (SD-OCT) and semi-automated measured (CarLQuant). For TMR, specimens were sectioned and the lesion depth was manually determined (Inspektor Research System).
The range of lesion depth detected with OCT was 24.0-174.0 μm (mouth rinse study), 18.0-178.0 μm (toothpastes study) and with TMR 59.2-198.0 μm (mouth rinse study), 33.2-133.4 μm (toothpastes study). We found a strong correlation between both methods in terms of lesion depth (Spearman rankwith outlierp < 0.001, Rho = 0.75, Spearman rankwithout outlierp = 0.001, Rho = 0.79). The two methods produce similar results (Passing-Bablok regression, 1.16). As deeper is the lesion, the smallest is the difference between both methods as indicated by Bland-Altman-plots.
Especially in the case of deep lesions, the values obtained by both methods are in agreement, and OCT can potentially substitute TMR to detect and assess lesion depth with the benefit of being non-destructive.
在牙科领域,对牙本质下龋损的可视成像具有重要意义,这可以通过有创的放射技术以及现有的无损成像方法来实现。因此,作为开发新创新方法的第一步,我们应用光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)来检测病变深度,并与既定的参考技术(横向显微放射照相术[TMR])进行比较。
根据之前的研究,将牛牙釉质标本脱矿化 5 天。对于 OCT,使用三维扫描(SD-OCT)和半自动测量(CarLQuant)对所得人工病变进行扫描。对于 TMR,将标本切片并手动确定病变深度(Inspektor 研究系统)。
OCT 检测到的病变深度范围为 24.0-174.0μm(漱口研究),18.0-178.0μm(牙膏研究),而 TMR 检测到的病变深度范围为 59.2-198.0μm(漱口研究),33.2-133.4μm(牙膏研究)。我们发现两种方法在病变深度方面具有很强的相关性(Spearman 秩检验带离群值 p < 0.001,Rho = 0.75,Spearman 秩检验无离群值 p = 0.001,Rho = 0.79)。两种方法产生相似的结果(Passing-Bablok 回归,1.16)。正如病变越深,两种方法之间的差异就越小,这一点通过 Bland-Altman 图可以得到证明。
特别是在病变较深的情况下,两种方法获得的结果是一致的,并且 OCT 有可能替代 TMR 来检测和评估病变深度,而其优势在于无损性。