Suppr超能文献

使用近红外辐射辅助口腔内扫描仪检测乳牙近端龋齿:一项体外研究。

Detection of proximal dental caries in primary teeth with a near-infrared-irradiation-assisted intraoral scanner: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Tashkandi Abeer K, Jiffri Sultan O, Albalawi Rahaf M, Albukhari Sara A, Mugharbil Sulafa A, Yeslam Hanin E

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80200, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Advanced Technology Dental Research Laboratory, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80209, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05629-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The early detection of dental caries is crucial for successful dental care. New intraoral scanners using near-infrared irradiation (NIRI) technology track preventive lesions without ionizing radiation. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of intraoral scanners (IOSs) in detecting proximal caries in primary posterior teeth, compared to conventional methods such as loupes-assisted clinical exams and bitewing (BW) radiography.

METHODS

Fifteen examined tooth surfaces were used to produce a total of 60 scores by a restorative dentistry consultant (RDC). The tooth surfaces were categorized into caries-free (n = 5 × 4 exam methods) and carious (n = 10 × 4 exam methods) subgroups. Artificial caries lesions were created on specified surfaces and mounted on typodont in sets for evaluation using a simplified modified ICDAS visual and BW radiographic examination, DIAGNOcam device, and iTero Element 5D NIRI-assisted IOS. Reference surface scores were recorded. Investigators (RDCs and recent dental graduates (RDGs)) were trained and calibrated. Inter-examiner agreement, agreement with reference, specificity, and sensitivity were checked.

RESULTS

The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity differed between the diagnostic tests. The best agreement of all investigated diagnostic methods with the reference was found using the DIAGNOcam device (ĸ = 0.87) and BW radiography (ĸ = 1.00). High agreement was found for visual examination (by the RDC and RDGs (ĸ ≈ 0.85)) and iTero 5D examination (ĸ = 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

The iTero Element 5D IOS had lower sensitivity and specificity compared to other methods. The potential use of IOSs with NIRI as a substitute for conventional diagnostic methods in primary teeth shows promise but requires further investigation.

摘要

背景

早期发现龋齿对于成功的牙科护理至关重要。新型口腔内扫描仪采用近红外照射(NIRI)技术,无需电离辐射即可追踪预防性病变。本研究旨在评估口腔内扫描仪(IOS)在检测乳牙后牙邻面龋方面的性能,并与传统方法(如头戴放大镜辅助临床检查和咬合翼片(BW)X线摄影)进行比较。

方法

一位修复牙科顾问(RDC)对15个检查的牙齿表面进行评分,共产生60个分数。牙齿表面分为无龋(n = 5×4种检查方法)和龋坏(n = 10×4种检查方法)亚组。在特定表面制造人工龋损,并安装在牙模型上,使用简化的改良国际龋病检测和评估系统(ICDAS)视觉和BW X线摄影检查、DIAGNOcam设备以及iTero Element 5D NIRI辅助IOS进行评估。记录参考表面分数。研究人员(RDC和近期牙科毕业生(RDG))接受培训并进行校准。检查不同检查者之间的一致性、与参考的一致性、特异性和敏感性。

结果

结果表明,诊断测试之间的敏感性和特异性有所不同。使用DIAGNOcam设备(ĸ = 0.87)和BW X线摄影(ĸ = 1.00)时,所有研究的诊断方法与参考的一致性最佳。视觉检查(RDC和RDG进行,ĸ≈0.85)和iTero 5D检查(ĸ = 0.87)的一致性较高。

结论

与其他方法相比,iTero Element 5D IOS的敏感性和特异性较低。将具有NIRI的IOS作为乳牙传统诊断方法的替代品的潜在用途显示出前景,但需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71bf/11844066/ac0365508bbb/12903_2025_5629_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验