School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Division of Cardiology, Departments of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jul 15;223:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 May 17.
The benefits of rapidly up-titrating evidence-based treatments following heart failure (HF) hospitalizations were demonstrated in the The Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by NT-proBNP Testing, of Heart Failure Therapies (STRONG-HF) trial and emphasized in contemporary HF guidelines. We aimed to assess up-titration patterns of guideline-directed medical treatments in the Taiwanese HF population. Combining data from the Taiwan Society of Cardiology - Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (TSOC-HFrEF) registry and the Treatment with Angiotensin Receptor neprilysin inhibitor for Taiwan Acute Heart Failure (TAROT-AHF) study cohort, we formed the "Taiwan real-world cohort". We compared these data with subgroups of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% in the STRONG-HF trial. Patients in the Taiwan cohort exhibited similar blood pressure, heart rate and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels at discharge compared with those in the STRONG-HF trial. A higher proportion of patients in the STRONG-HF high-intensity care group received up-titrations compared with those in the usual care group and the Taiwan cohort. Composite all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization at 180 days for patients in the high-intensity care group, usual care group, and Taiwan cohort were 17.4%, 23.7%, and 31.9%, respectively, with differences largely contributed by HF hospitalization (10.1%, 17.9%, and 27.6%, respectively), whereas all-cause mortality rates were similar (11.0%, 9.6%, and 9.3%, respectively). Gender did not affect this trend. In conclusion, our data highlights a treatment gap between the STRONG-HF trial and real-world practices in Taiwan, urging prompt optimization of HF therapy.
心力衰竭(HF)住院后迅速滴定基于证据的治疗的益处已在心力衰竭安全性、耐受性和疗效的快速优化研究(STRONG-HF 试验)中得到证实,并在当代心力衰竭指南中得到强调。我们旨在评估台湾心力衰竭人群中指南指导的药物治疗滴定模式。我们将台湾心脏病学会-射血分数降低的心力衰竭(TSOC-HFrEF)注册数据库和台湾急性心力衰竭治疗的血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂研究队列(TAROT-AHF)的数据相结合,形成了“台湾真实世界队列”。我们将这些数据与 STRONG-HF 试验中左心室射血分数≤40%的患者亚组进行了比较。与 STRONG-HF 试验相比,台湾队列患者出院时的血压、心率和 N 末端 B 型利钠肽水平相似。与常规护理组和台湾队列相比,STRONG-HF 高强化护理组中有更高比例的患者接受了滴定治疗。高强化护理组、常规护理组和台湾队列患者在 180 天时的全因死亡率或 HF 住院复合终点发生率分别为 17.4%、23.7%和 31.9%,差异主要由 HF 住院(分别为 10.1%、17.9%和 27.6%)所致,而全因死亡率相似(分别为 11.0%、9.6%和 9.3%)。性别并未影响这一趋势。总之,我们的数据强调了 STRONG-HF 试验与台湾真实世界实践之间存在治疗差距,迫切需要优化心力衰竭治疗。