Department of Medicine Yale University School of Medicine New Haven CT.
BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 16;10(4):e019238. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019238. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common comorbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, associated with undertreatment and worse outcomes. New treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction may be particularly important in patients with concomitant COPD. Methods and Results We examined outcomes in 8399 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, according to COPD status, in the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Blocker-Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) trial. Cox regression models were used to compare COPD versus non-COPD subgroups and the effects of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril. Patients with COPD (n=1080, 12.9%) were older than patients without COPD (mean 67 versus 63 years; <0.001), with similar left ventricular ejection fraction (29.9% versus 29.4%), but higher NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; median, 1741 pg/mL versus 1591 pg/mL; P=0.01), worse functional class (New York Heart Association III/IV 37% versus 23%; <0.001) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score (73 versus 81; <0.001), and more congestion and comorbidity. Medical therapy was similar in patients with and without COPD except for beta-blockade (87% versus 94%; <0.001) and diuretics (85% versus 80%; <0.001). After multivariable adjustment, COPD was associated with higher risks of heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.54), and the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.34), but not cardiovascular death (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.94-1.30), or all-cause mortality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.99-1.31). COPD was also associated with higher risk of all cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.31) and noncardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.29-1.64). The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril was consistent in patients with and without COPD for all end points. Conclusions In PARADIGM-HF, COPD was associated with lower use of beta-blockers and worse health status and was an independent predictor of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular hospitalization. Sacubitril/valsartan was beneficial in this high-risk subgroup. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01035255.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是射血分数降低的心力衰竭的常见合并症,与治疗不足和预后较差有关。新型心力衰竭治疗药物可能对伴有 COPD 的患者尤其重要。
我们在 PARADIGM-HF(血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗心力衰竭的前瞻性比较,以确定对全球心力衰竭死亡率和发病率的影响)试验中,根据 COPD 状况,对 8399 例射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的结局进行了研究。使用 Cox 回归模型比较了 COPD 与非 COPD 亚组以及沙库巴曲缬沙坦与依那普利的效果。患有 COPD(n=1080,12.9%)的患者比没有 COPD 的患者年龄更大(平均 67 岁比 63 岁;<0.001),左心室射血分数相似(29.9%比 29.4%),但 N 末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP;中位数,1741pg/mL 比 1591pg/mL;P=0.01)更高,功能状态更差(纽约心脏协会 III/IV 级 37%比 23%;<0.001),堪萨斯城心肌病问卷-临床综合评分(73 分比 81 分;<0.001)更差,且充血和合并症更多。患有和不患有 COPD 的患者的药物治疗相似,但β受体阻滞剂(87%比 94%;<0.001)和利尿剂(85%比 80%;<0.001)除外。经过多变量调整后,COPD 与心力衰竭住院风险增加相关(危险比 [HR],1.32;95%置信区间 [CI],1.13-1.54),以及心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院的复合终点(HR,1.18;95%CI,1.05-1.34),但与心血管死亡(HR,1.10;95%CI,0.94-1.30)或全因死亡率(HR,1.14;95%CI,0.99-1.31)无关。COPD 也与所有心血管住院(HR,1.17;95%CI,1.05-1.31)和非心血管住院(HR,1.45;95%CI,1.29-1.64)风险增加相关。沙库巴曲缬沙坦优于依那普利的获益在 COPD 患者和非 COPD 患者中对于所有终点都是一致的。
在 PARADIGM-HF 中,COPD 与β受体阻滞剂使用率较低和健康状况较差有关,是心血管和非心血管住院的独立预测因素。沙库巴曲缬沙坦在这一高危亚组中是有益的。