Department of Health Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Physical Therapy, Ararangua, Brazil.
Department of Health Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Physical Therapy, Ararangua, Brazil.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Apr;38:399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.10.006. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
To investigate and compare the effectiveness of aquatic physiotherapy and therapeutic exercise in the physical and functional performance of patients with chronic low back pain.
Twenty-six participants were randomized into 3 groups, namely an aquatic physiotherapy group (AG), a therapeutic exercise group (EG), and a control group (CG). The pain, disability, and quality of life were compared before and after the exercise protocols for 2 months, twice a week, on alternate days, for 60 min. For statistical analyses, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test the difference between the groups; the Wilcoxon test and the effect size were used for before-and-after comparisons.
Twenty participants completed the study. There was a significant difference improvement in pain between the AG and the EG (p = 0.004), between the EG and the CG (p = 0.05), and in social role functioning between the groups (p = 0.02). No differences were observed in the other analyzed variables between the groups. Compared to the pre-treatment state, there were significant improvements in the AG in terms of pain (p = 0.02), functionality (p = 0.03), and general health status (p = 0.04).
The AG group showed significant and clinical improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life. Improvements related to social aspects were found in the EG compared to the CG. The water provides a safe environment that facilitates the onset of exercise, so aquatic physiotherapy could be considered the first recommendation for patients with low back pain.
调查和比较水疗和运动疗法对慢性下腰痛患者身体和功能表现的疗效。
将 26 名参与者随机分为 3 组,即水疗组(AG)、运动疗法组(EG)和对照组(CG)。在 2 个月内,每周两次,隔日进行 60 分钟的运动方案后,比较疼痛、残疾和生活质量。统计分析采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较组间差异;Wilcoxon 检验和效应量用于前后比较。
20 名参与者完成了研究。AG 和 EG 之间(p=0.004)、EG 和 CG 之间(p=0.05)以及组间社会角色功能(p=0.02)的疼痛均有显著改善。组间其他分析变量无差异。与治疗前相比,AG 在疼痛(p=0.02)、功能(p=0.03)和一般健康状况(p=0.04)方面均有显著改善。
AG 组在疼痛、残疾和生活质量方面有显著的临床改善。与 CG 相比,EG 在社会方面有改善。水提供了一个安全的环境,便于开始运动,因此水疗可被视为腰痛患者的首选建议。