Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Sep;207(2):313-321. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07360-4. Epub 2024 May 19.
Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are common among individuals with breast cancer (BC) and poorly managed symptoms are associated with reduced quality of life, treatment discontinuation, and poorer breast cancer outcomes. Direct comparisons among therapies are limited, as prior studies evaluating VMS interventions have utilized heterogeneous change measures which may not fully assess the perceived impact of change in VMS severity.
We performed a prospective study where BC patients chose one of four categories of interventions to manage VMS. Change in VMS severity at 6 weeks was assessed using the validated Hot Flush Rating Scale (HFRS). A novel weighted change score integrating baseline symptom severity and directionality of change was computed to maximize the correlation between the change score and a perceived treatment effectiveness score. Variables influencing change in VMS severity were included in a regression tree to model factors influencing the weighted change score.
100 baseline and follow-up questionnaires assessing VMS were completed by 88 patients. Correlations between treatment effectiveness and VMS outcomes strengthened following adjustment for baseline symptoms. Patients with low VMS severity at baseline did not perceive change in treatment effectiveness. Intervention category was predictive of change in HFRS at 6 weeks.
Baseline symptom severity and the directionality of change (improvement or deterioration of symptoms) influenced the perception of clinically meaningful change in VMS severity. Future interventional studies utilizing the weighted change score should target moderate-high baseline severity patients.
血管舒缩症状(VMS)在乳腺癌(BC)患者中较为常见,而症状管理不善与生活质量下降、治疗中断以及更差的乳腺癌结局相关。由于先前评估 VMS 干预措施的研究采用了可能无法充分评估 VMS 严重程度变化的感知影响的异质变化措施,因此治疗方法之间的直接比较受到限制。
我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,其中 BC 患者选择了四种 VMS 管理干预措施之一。在 6 周时使用经过验证的热潮红评分量表(HFRS)评估 VMS 严重程度的变化。计算了一种新的加权变化分数,该分数整合了基线症状严重程度和变化方向,以最大程度地提高变化分数与感知治疗效果评分之间的相关性。将影响 VMS 严重程度变化的变量纳入回归树模型中,以模拟影响加权变化分数的因素。
共有 88 名患者完成了 100 份基线和随访评估 VMS 的问卷。在调整基线症状后,治疗效果与 VMS 结局之间的相关性得到加强。基线 VMS 严重程度较低的患者并未感知到治疗效果的变化。干预类别可预测 6 周时 HFRS 的变化。
基线症状严重程度和变化方向(症状改善或恶化)影响了对 VMS 严重程度的临床有意义变化的感知。未来使用加权变化分数的干预性研究应针对中高度基线严重程度的患者。