Suppr超能文献

确定医院获得性感染的抗生素治疗时间过长:一种支持抗菌药物管理的半自动方法。

Identifying excessive length of antibiotic treatment duration for hospital-acquired infections: a semi-automated approach to support antimicrobial stewardship.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 May 20;13(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01406-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Avoiding excessive antibiotic treatment duration is a fundamental goal in antimicrobial stewardship. Manual collection of data is a time-consuming process, but a semi-automated approach for data extraction has been shown feasible for community-acquired infections (CAI). Extraction of data however may be more challenging in hospital-acquired infections (HAI). The aim of this study is to explore whether semi-automated data extraction of treatment duration is also feasible and accurate for HAI.

METHODS

Data from a university-affiliated hospital over the period 1-6-2020 until 1-6-2022 was used for this study. From the Electronic Health Record, raw data on prescriptions, registered indications and admissions was extracted and processed to define treatment courses. In addition, clinical notes including prescription instructions were obtained for the purpose of validation. The derived treatment course was compared to the registered indication and the actual length of treatment (LOT) in the clinical notes in a random sample of 5.7% of treatment courses, to assess the accuracy of the data for both CAI and HAI.

RESULTS

Included were 10.564 treatment courses of which 73.1% were CAI and 26.8% HAI. The registered indication matched the diagnosis as recorded in the clinical notes in 79% of treatment courses (79.2% CAI, 78.5% HAI). Higher error rates were seen in urinary tract infections (UTIs) (29.0%) and respiratory tract infections (RTIs) (20.5%) compared to intra-abdominal infections (7.4%), or skin or soft tissue infections (11.1%), mainly due to incorrect specification of the type of UTI or RTI. The LOT was accurately extracted in 98.5% of courses (CAI 98.2%, HAI 99.3%) when compared to prescriptions in the EHR. In 21% of cases however the LOT did not match with the clinical notes, mainly if patients received treatment from other health care providers preceding or following the present course.

CONCLUSION

Semi-automatic data extraction can yield reliable information about the indication and LOT in treatment courses of hospitalized patients, for both HAI and CAI. This can provide stewardship programs with a surveillance tool for all in-hospital treated infections, which can be used to achieve stewardship goals.

摘要

背景

避免过度的抗生素治疗时间是抗菌药物管理的一个基本目标。手动数据收集是一个耗时的过程,但已经证明半自动化的数据提取方法对于社区获得性感染(CAI)是可行的。然而,在医院获得性感染(HAI)中,数据提取可能更具挑战性。本研究旨在探讨半自动化数据提取治疗时间是否也适用于 HAI 并具有准确性。

方法

本研究使用了一所大学附属医院在 2020 年 6 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 1 日期间的数据。从电子健康记录中,提取处方、登记的适应症和入院记录的原始数据,并进行处理以定义治疗疗程。此外,还获取了临床记录中的处方说明,用于验证目的。从治疗疗程中随机抽取 5.7%的治疗疗程,将得出的治疗疗程与登记的适应症和临床记录中的实际治疗时长(LOT)进行比较,以评估 CAI 和 HAI 数据的准确性。

结果

共纳入 10564 例治疗疗程,其中 73.1%为 CAI,26.8%为 HAI。登记的适应症与临床记录中记录的诊断相匹配,在 79%的治疗疗程中(79.2%的 CAI,78.5%的 HAI)。尿路感染(UTI)(29.0%)和呼吸道感染(RTI)(20.5%)的错误率高于腹腔内感染(7.4%)或皮肤或软组织感染(11.1%),主要是由于 UTI 或 RTI 的类型不正确。与 EHR 中的处方相比,98.5%的疗程(CAI 98.2%,HAI 99.3%)中 LOT 被准确提取。然而,在 21%的情况下,LOT 与临床记录不匹配,主要是因为患者在本次疗程之前或之后接受了其他医疗保健提供者的治疗。

结论

半自动化数据提取可以为住院患者的治疗疗程提供有关适应症和 LOT 的可靠信息,无论是 HAI 还是 CAI。这可以为管理计划提供一种用于监测所有住院治疗感染的工具,从而实现管理目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c031/11103818/7c7cdd74bbd1/13756_2024_1406_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验