• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物制剂初治中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者使用维得利珠单抗和英夫利昔单抗的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究。

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

J Dig Dis. 2024 Apr;25(4):230-237. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13270. Epub 2024 May 20.

DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.13270
PMID:38764418
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) and infliximab (IFX) in biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

Biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC who were treated with IFX or VDZ for at least 14 weeks at three tertiary hospitals in southwest China between January 2021 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. Efficacy of the biologics was evaluated based on the steroid-free clinical remission rate, clinical remission rate, and mucosal healing rate at Weeks 14 and 52. Adverse events related to biologic use were recorded.

RESULTS

Altogether 122 biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC were included. No marked differences in the steroid-free clinical remission rate and clinical remission rate were observed between the two groups at Week 14 or Week 52 (P > 0.05). The VDZ group exhibited a higher mucosal healing rate at Week 14 compared to the IFX group (33.3% vs 16.9%, P = 0.036), while that at Week 52 did not differ between the two groups (65.6% vs 47.1%, P = 0.098). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the two groups (P = 0.071).

CONCLUSION

VDZ and IFX showed comparable clinical efficacy and safety profiles and can be used as viable first-line therapeutic options for biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

摘要

目的

本多中心回顾性队列研究旨在评估维得利珠单抗(VDZ)和英夫利昔单抗(IFX)在生物初治中重度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间在中国西南地区的三家三级医院接受 IFX 或 VDZ 治疗至少 14 周的生物初治中重度 UC 患者。根据第 14 周和第 52 周的无激素临床缓解率、临床缓解率和黏膜愈合率来评估生物制剂的疗效。记录与生物制剂使用相关的不良事件。

结果

共纳入了 122 例生物初治中重度 UC 患者。两组在第 14 周或第 52 周时的无激素临床缓解率和临床缓解率无明显差异(P>0.05)。与 IFX 组相比,VDZ 组在第 14 周时的黏膜愈合率更高(33.3%比 16.9%,P=0.036),但在第 52 周时两组间无差异(65.6%比 47.1%,P=0.098)。两组间不良事件发生率无统计学差异(P=0.071)。

结论

VDZ 和 IFX 具有相似的临床疗效和安全性,可作为生物初治中重度 UC 患者的一线治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.生物制剂初治中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者使用维得利珠单抗和英夫利昔单抗的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究。
J Dig Dis. 2024 Apr;25(4):230-237. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13270. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis included in randomised controlled trials.纳入随机对照试验的克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎患者中,皮下注射英夫利昔单抗和维得利珠单抗的疗效和安全性比较。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03163-5.
3
Vedolizumab is superior to infliximab in biologic naïve patients with ulcerative colitis.维得利珠单抗在生物制剂初治溃疡性结肠炎患者中优于英夫利昔单抗。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 1;13(1):1816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28907-3.
4
Comparative Efficacy of Vedolizumab and Adalimumab in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Previously Treated With Infliximab.比较维得利珠单抗和阿达木单抗在先前接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者中的疗效。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 Oct 18;25(11):1805-1812. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izz057.
5
Comparison of clinical and endoscopic efficacy between vedolizumab and infliximab in bio-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis: a multicenter, real-world study.维多珠单抗与英夫利昔单抗在初治溃疡性结肠炎患者中的临床和内镜疗效比较:一项多中心真实世界研究
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 13;17:17562848241281218. doi: 10.1177/17562848241281218. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparative efficacy and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab in ulcerative colitis after failure of a first subcutaneous anti-TNF agent: a multicentre cohort study.在首支皮下抗 TNF 药物治疗失败后,比较维得利珠单抗和英夫利昔单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性:一项多中心队列研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 May;51(9):852-860. doi: 10.1111/apt.15680. Epub 2020 Mar 22.
7
Real-life effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: A single-center experience in Northern China.维得利珠单抗治疗中重度溃疡性结肠炎的真实世界疗效和安全性:中国北方单中心经验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 5;103(27):e38759. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038759.
8
Proactive infliximab is more effective than vedolizumab in inducing fecal calprotectin remission in inflammatory bowel disease.在诱导炎症性肠病患者粪便钙卫蛋白缓解方面,提前使用英夫利昔单抗比维多珠单抗更有效。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct;57(10):1202-1208. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2076567. Epub 2022 May 22.
9
Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab in Anti-TNF-Naïve Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Multicenter Retrospective European Study.抗 TNF 初治炎症性肠病患者使用维得利珠单抗的有效性和安全性:一项多中心回顾性欧洲研究。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Oct 12;24(11):2442-2451. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy155.
10
An international multicentre study of SwiTching from Intravenous to subcutaneous inflixiMab and vEdolizumab in inflammatory bowel diseases: The TIME study.一项关于在炎症性肠病中从静脉输注转换为皮下注射英夫利昔单抗和维多珠单抗的国际多中心研究:TIME 研究。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2024 Nov;54(11):e14283. doi: 10.1111/eci.14283. Epub 2024 Jul 9.