Farahani Parham Khoshdani, Safaei Neda
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Surg Open Sci. 2024 May 3;19:162-165. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.007. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Closure of the appendix stump after appendectomy is considered one of the most important parts of laparoscopic appendectomy. Various techniques are used during this surgery, commonly including endoclips and ligatures. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare endoclips with intra-corporeal ligatures in closing the appendix stump during laparoscopic appendectomy.
This retrospective study was conducted using data from 50 patients with acute appendicitis who underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy. The data from patients whose stumps were closed using endoclips in 25 patients (Group I) and with intra-corporeal ligatures in 25 patients (Group II) were extracted and compared regarding the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications.
There were no differences between the two methods in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The duration of surgery in the ligature group was significantly longer than in the clip group ( = 0.044). The hospital stay duration was clinically longer in the ligature group, but this difference was not statistically significant ( > 0.05).
Endoclips for closing the appendix stump are safer with a shorter operating time and also a simpler method. Therefore, they could be a reliable alternative to the method of closing the appendix stump with ligatures.
阑尾切除术后阑尾残端的闭合被认为是腹腔镜阑尾切除术最重要的部分之一。该手术过程中会使用多种技术,常见的包括内镜夹和结扎术。因此,本研究旨在比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用内镜夹与体内结扎术闭合阑尾残端的效果。
本回顾性研究使用了50例接受单纯腹腔镜阑尾切除术的急性阑尾炎患者的数据。提取了25例使用内镜夹闭合残端的患者(第一组)和25例使用体内结扎术的患者(第二组)的数据,并比较了术中及术后并发症的发生情况。
两种方法在术中及术后并发症方面无差异。结扎组的手术时间明显长于夹子组(P = 0.044)。结扎组的住院时间在临床上更长,但这种差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
使用内镜夹闭合阑尾残端更安全,手术时间更短,方法也更简单。因此,它们可以成为用结扎术闭合阑尾残端方法的可靠替代方案。