• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在单纯性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术中,体内打结与使用金属夹闭合阑尾残端的比较。

Intracorporeal knotting versus metal endoclip application for the closure of the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis.

作者信息

Gonenc Murat, Gemici Eyup, Kalayci Mustafa Uygar, Karabulut Mehmet, Turhan Ahmet Nuray, Alis Halil

机构信息

General Surgery Clinics, Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Apr;22(3):231-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0335. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2011.0335
PMID:22145572
Abstract

PURPOSE

The goal of the study was to compare the efficacy of two methods--intracorporeal knotting and metal endoclip application--for closure of the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy in a specific group of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis.

METHODS

The patients were randomized into two groups who had their appendiceal stump secured by intracorporeal knotting (Group 1) and metal endoclipping (Group 2). Primary outcome measure was postoperative complications, whereas secondary outcome measures were intraoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, and re-admissions (including rehospitalizations and reoperations).

RESULTS

One hundred seven patients were prospectively recruited in a randomized study between December 2010 and May 2011. Group 1 and Group 2 included 46 and 61 patients, respectively. The rate of postoperative complications in Group 1 and Group 2 was 8.7% (4/46) and 4.9% (3/61) (P>.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in secondary outcome measures except the mean operative time (61.9 minutes versus 46.3 minutes, P=.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

The closure of the appendiceal stump by either intracorporeal knotting or metal endoclipping during laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis is safe with comparable morbidity and mortality rates.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较在一组患有单纯性阑尾炎的特定患者中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术期间两种闭合阑尾残端的方法——体内打结法和金属夹闭法——的疗效。

方法

患者被随机分为两组,分别采用体内打结法(第1组)和金属夹闭法(第2组)固定阑尾残端。主要结局指标是术后并发症,次要结局指标是术中并发症、手术时间、住院时间和再次入院情况(包括再次住院和再次手术)。

结果

在2010年12月至2011年5月期间,一项随机研究前瞻性纳入了107例患者。第1组和第2组分别包括46例和61例患者。第1组和第2组的术后并发症发生率分别为8.7%(4/46)和4.9%(3/61)(P>0.05)。除平均手术时间外(61.9分钟对46.3分钟,P = 0.0008),两组在次要结局指标方面无显著差异。

结论

在单纯性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术中,采用体内打结法或金属夹闭法闭合阑尾残端是安全的,发病率和死亡率相当。

相似文献

1
Intracorporeal knotting versus metal endoclip application for the closure of the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis.在单纯性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术中,体内打结与使用金属夹闭合阑尾残端的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Apr;22(3):231-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0335. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
2
Comparison of intracorporeal knot-tying suture (polyglactin) and titanium endoclips in laparoscopic appendiceal stump closure: a prospective randomized study.腹腔镜阑尾残端闭合中体内打结缝线(聚乙醇酸)与钛夹的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Jun;22(3):226-31. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824f25cd.
3
Appendix stump closure with endoloop in laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用Endoloop闭合阑尾残端
Ann Ital Chir. 2014 Nov-Dec;85(6):606-9.
4
Metal endoclips for the closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy.金属夹用于腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端的闭合。
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Apr;16(2):139-41. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0764-7. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
5
Is laparoscopic appendectomy going to be standard procedure for acute appendicitis; a 5-year single center experience with 1,788 patients.腹腔镜阑尾切除术会成为急性阑尾炎的标准术式吗?一项针对1788例患者的单中心5年经验总结。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Feb;41(1):87-9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0411-x. Epub 2014 May 31.
6
Comparison of intracorporeal knotting and endoloop for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中体内打结与Endoloop闭合残端的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Dec;21(6):446-9. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.56798.
7
Analysis of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure.阑尾残端闭合中使用内翻缝合与内圈套扎进行体内打结的分析。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013 Mar;8(1):69-73. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.31535. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
8
Comparison of the electrothermal vessel-sealing system versus endoclip in laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中电热血管封闭系统与内镜夹的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Jun;19(3):375-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0368.
9
Hem-o-lok clips versus intracorporeal knotting for the closure of the appendix stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: A prospective randomized study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用Hem-o-lok夹与体内打结法闭合阑尾残端的前瞻性随机研究
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 May;26(3):384-388. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.02248.
10
Lateral thermal damage of mesoappendix and appendiceal base during laparoscopic appendectomy in children: comparison of the harmonic scalpel (Ultracision), bipolar coagulation (LigaSure), and thermal fusion technology (MiSeal).小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾系膜及阑尾根部的侧向热损伤:超声刀(Ultracision)、双极电凝(LigaSure)和热融合技术(MiSeal)的比较
J Surg Res. 2017 May 15;212:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoloop Versus Metallic Clip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中残端闭合使用Endoloop与金属夹的系统评价和Meta分析
Cureus. 2025 Jan 15;17(1):e77471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77471. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Effectiveness of different appendiceal stump closure methods in laparoscopic appendectomy a network meta-analysis.不同阑尾残端闭合方法在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的效果:一项网状Meta 分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Sep 5;409(1):270. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03452-3.
3
Comparison of two methods: Clipping and suturing in laparoscopic appendectomy.
两种方法的比较:腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的夹闭与缝合
Surg Open Sci. 2024 May 3;19:162-165. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.007. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Enhanced perioperative care in emergency general surgery: the WSES position paper.加强急诊普通外科围手术期护理:WSES 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Oct 6;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00519-2.
5
Effect of endoscopic loop ties in acute appendicitis on wound infection rate: A meta-analysis.内镜套扎环在急性阑尾炎中对伤口感染率的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3048-3056. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14180. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: A systematic review of the literature.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端的闭合:文献系统综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Aug 4;57:228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.058. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Re-evaluation of purse string suture in laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术荷包缝合的再评价。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06828-5. Epub 2019 May 13.
8
Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Single Endoloop Stump Closure.单端环闭合式开放及腹腔镜阑尾切除术的结果
JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00062.
9
Closure methods of the appendix stump for complications during laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端并发症的闭合方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 13;11(11):CD006437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006437.pub3.
10
Absorbable polymeric surgical clips for appendicular stump closure: A randomized control trial of laparoscopic appendectomy with lapro-clips.用于阑尾残端闭合的可吸收聚合物外科夹:腹腔镜阑尾切除术使用lapro夹的随机对照试验。
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 5;7(27):41265-41273. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9283.