Suppr超能文献

自体富血小板血浆在皮肤移植保存中的应用:一项实验性比较研究。

Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma for skin graft preservation: an experimental comparative study.

作者信息

Odlozilova Sarka, Paral Jiri, Slaninka Igor, Zajak Jan, Lesko Michal, Geryk Tomas, Gerykova Lucie, Sirovy Miroslav

机构信息

Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Int J Burns Trauma. 2024 Apr 15;14(2):38-47. doi: 10.62347/MLIW4300. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this experimental study, we aimed to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a suitable preservative for dermo-epidermal grafts. An additional objective was to investigate how long grafts can be stored without biological degradation.

METHODS

We compared pig skin graft preservation using PRP versus saline solution and crystalloid Custodiol, which is used for hypothermic preservation of organs for transplantation. Grafts (10 × 10 mm) were placed on gauze impregnated with one of the tested solutions, and stored for 3, 7, 11, and 15 days at a constant temperature of 4°C. We evaluated a total of 240 pig skin samples: 120 by histopathology and 120 by fluorescence optical microscopy.

RESULTS

Overall, Custodiol solution appeared to be the best medium for preservation of dermo-epidermal grafts, with beneficial properties manifested on days 7 and 11. Although we expected PRP to be a better preservative than saline, this was not confirmed by our results, as we found no significant difference between these two media. In fact, by day 3, the histopathological results were better with standard saline solution than with PRP. On day 15, with each tested solution, some samples showed histological changes that are incompatible with graft viability.

CONCLUSION

Overall, Custodiol appears to be the best medium for dermo-epidermal graft preservation. Moreover, the present findings suggest a maximum graft storage time of 11 days in all of the tested solutions. We do not recommend using grafts stored for 15 days, due to isolated signs of graft biodegradation with all solutions.

摘要

目的

在本实验研究中,我们旨在确定富血小板血浆(PRP)是否是真皮 - 表皮移植物的合适防腐剂。另一个目的是研究移植物在不发生生物降解的情况下可以保存多长时间。

方法

我们比较了使用PRP与盐溶液及晶体心脏停搏液(用于器官移植的低温保存)保存猪皮移植物的效果。将移植物(10×10毫米)放置在浸渍有其中一种测试溶液的纱布上,并在4°C恒温下保存3、7、11和15天。我们总共评估了240个猪皮样本:120个通过组织病理学评估,120个通过荧光光学显微镜评估。

结果

总体而言,心脏停搏液似乎是保存真皮 - 表皮移植物的最佳介质,在第7天和第11天表现出有益特性。尽管我们预期PRP会比盐溶液是更好的防腐剂,但我们的结果并未证实这一点,因为我们发现这两种介质之间没有显著差异。事实上,在第3天,标准盐溶液的组织病理学结果比PRP更好。在第15天,使用每种测试溶液时,一些样本显示出与移植物活力不相容的组织学变化。

结论

总体而言,心脏停搏液似乎是真皮 - 表皮移植物保存的最佳介质。此外,目前的研究结果表明,在所有测试溶液中,移植物的最长保存时间为11天。由于所有溶液都出现了移植物生物降解的孤立迹象,我们不建议使用保存15天的移植物。

相似文献

2
Skin graft storage in platelet rich plasma (PRP).富血小板血浆(PRP)中储存的皮肤移植物。
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Jan;33(1):e13178. doi: 10.1111/dth.13178. Epub 2019 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

7
Skin graft storage in platelet rich plasma (PRP).富血小板血浆(PRP)中储存的皮肤移植物。
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Jan;33(1):e13178. doi: 10.1111/dth.13178. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
8
Emerging imaging technologies in dermatology: Part I: Basic principles.皮肤科新兴影像学技术:第一部分:基本原理。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Apr;80(4):1114-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.042. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验