Wankhar Dapkupar, Prabu Kumar Archana, Vijayakumar Venugopal, A Velan, Balakrishnan Arthi, Ravi Poornima, Rudra Bhandari, K Maheshkumar
Physiology, People's College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bhanpur, IND.
College of Medicine and Medical Science, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, BHR.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 17;16(4):e58434. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58434. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Elevated blood pressure is one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Available evidence on mind-body medicine (MBM) techniques on blood pressure is inconclusive and provides conflicting results. The objective of the current systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of MBM techniques on blood pressure in patients with cardiovascular disease. Randomized control trials (RCTs) done between the years 2000 and 2020 on cardiovascular disease, using MBM techniques such as meditation, mindfulness-based stress reduction and relaxation techniques were searched through electronic databases such as PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL), EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Three authors independently performed article selection, data extraction and validation. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effect model and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated for the effect size. Fifteen RCTs with 927 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity among the studies was very high for all analyses (I>94%). For studies comparing systolic blood pressure, MBM interventions show a significant (p=0.01) effect when compared to conventional treatment, an overall estimated effect size of SMD - 0.78 (95% CI: -1.36, -0.20). For studies comparing the diastolic blood pressure, MBM intervention did not show any significant effect when compared to the conventional treatment, an overall effect size of SMD -0.26 (95% CI: -0.91, 0.39). The findings of the meta-analysis suggest that MBM interventions may improve systolic blood pressure alone in patients with cardiac diseases. With high heterogeneity and low quality of the included studies, more robust evidence is required before suggesting MBM as an effective treatment modality for reducing blood pressure in cardiovascular diseases.
血压升高是心血管疾病的主要危险因素之一。关于身心医学(MBM)技术对血压影响的现有证据尚无定论,且结果相互矛盾。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估MBM技术对心血管疾病患者血压的影响。通过电子数据库,如PubMed、护理及相关健康累积索引(CINAHL)、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,检索了2000年至2020年间使用冥想、基于正念的减压和放松技术等MBM技术对心血管疾病进行的随机对照试验(RCT)。三位作者独立进行文章筛选、数据提取和验证。使用随机效应模型和标准化均值差(SMD)进行荟萃分析,并估计效应大小的95%置信区间(CI)。荟萃分析纳入了15项RCT,共927例患者。所有分析中研究间的异质性都非常高(I>94%)。对于比较收缩压的研究,与传统治疗相比,MBM干预显示出显著(p=0.01)效果,总体估计效应大小为SMD -0.78(95%CI:-1.36,-0.20)。对于比较舒张压的研究,与传统治疗相比,MBM干预未显示出任何显著效果,总体效应大小为SMD -0.26(95%CI:-0.91,0.39)。荟萃分析结果表明,MBM干预可能仅改善心脏病患者的收缩压。由于纳入研究的异质性高且质量低,在建议将MBM作为降低心血管疾病血压的有效治疗方式之前,需要更有力的证据。